Building a garage on the boundary is not possible according to the architect.

  • Erstellt am 2015-09-10 09:04:49

Watcher78

2015-09-10 09:04:49
  • #1
Hello everyone,
our property ( X ) has been leveled and the heights taken. Actually, we had planned to place our garage at the front left on our southwest side.
You can see on the scan that the right boundary stone is at 0 and that there is a slope of 0.85 towards the second boundary stone. We actually want to position our garage there because of the sun path and because the neighbor has large windows facing us. Our architect says it is only possible on the right at the boundary of the existing house No. 17.
Our neighbor on the left next to us has already started building and has dug into the property. He is 2.61 m below our right boundary stone, if I understood that correctly.
I still do not understand why we are not allowed to build our garage on the boundary with the left neighbor. After all, he has dug into the terrain.

Can someone please explain this to me or give feedback that our architect is wrong?! We are building in NRW if relevant for boundary construction.
 

Musketier

2015-09-10 09:29:21
  • #2
Read up on this:



Your problem sounds quite similar to me.
Maybe can respond to you then.
 

DG

2015-09-10 11:27:12
  • #3
Hello Watcher78,

the -2.61m is almost certainly the top edge of the finished basement floor. With a floor height of about 2.90m, the top edge of the finished ground floor would then be about +30cm above ground level.

There can be several reasons for the garage position, but the architect should be able to explain this. For example, it could be due to the building window. If, according to the development plan, the garage must be placed within the building window and there is no building window where you want to put the garage, then it initially won’t be possible. However, there are solutions for this too.

Further information can only be given in connection with the development plan including the written part.

Best regards
Dirk Grafe
 

Watcher78

2015-09-10 11:37:17
  • #4
Hello Dirk Grafe,

thank you for the feedback and your explanations. I don't quite understand what is meant by the +30cm now? That we then end up 30cm too high, or how should I understand that?

We do not have a development plan, we build according to § 34 of the Building Code, so there should be no problems. I know it had something to do with the height that we would be too high to build the garage on the boundary there. Alternatively, one could place the garage next to the house but then it goes down to our basement level. We don't want that because then you would always have to drive backwards uphill out of the garage and it is, of course, more costly.

I understand it as meaning that there is 1 m between both front measuring points for us and this meter is missing in height for us to build the garage on the boundary there.
 

DG

2015-09-10 13:29:53
  • #5


No, that was the explanation that your neighbor is not digging 2.60m deep into the terrain, but that is his basement level. No one builds a ground floor 2.60m deep, so he is not digging in, rather his design height is roughly as high as yours. But that doesn’t matter anyway, because the heights for buildings directly adjacent ON the boundary, but ON the (respective) building plot are generally measured in relation to the existing/natural/original ground surface of one’s own property.



Yes and no. It depends on how and whether you model/raise/lower your terrain. If you fill up 82cm on the west side, then these 82cm are added to the garage wall height, meaning you should only be allowed to build a garage with approximately 2.20m clear height on the west side without having to obtain a building servitude from the neighbor. This problem does not arise on the east side. Or you leave the terrain as it is, then the garage stands roughly as you describe with the corresponding disadvantages.

Best regards
Dirk Grafe
 

Watcher78

2015-09-10 15:16:37
  • #6
Hello Dirk,

thank you for the detailed description. So that means talking to the neighbor or he agrees to the matter or just placing the garage to the east.
 

Similar topics
26.02.2015Floor plan house / property28
18.10.2016Plan location of house & garage within building window *Pre-planning*129
18.01.2019Development plan: Garage on the boundary outside the building window53
15.08.2018Basic floor area ratio / floor area ratio for plots without a development plan: How to calculate? Experiences?18
26.09.2018Floor plan of a 140 m² single-family house with garage - Is the house orientation okay?18
09.04.2019Orientation of the house on the property - fewer retaining walls?21
24.04.2019Single-family house with garage on a gentle slope17
02.07.2019Long narrow plot 170-190 sqm50
07.11.2019Single-family house 172 sqm with garage and sauna54
03.02.2020Floor area ratio / plot ratio in the development plan of 196811
13.05.2020Single-family house 11.35x9.65 floor plan and placement on the property29
03.09.2020Modern single-family house with architect in southern Germany25
12.11.2020Plot 1250m², living area 200m², 4-person household25
21.12.2020Single-family house 150m2 floor plan + planning on the property24
22.12.2020Floor plan of a single-family house with a flat roof on a 600m² plot19
30.01.2022Plot 4500 m² (nursery) - preparation of development plan independently16
23.01.2024Floor plan for a single-family house with 200m² with a separate apartment 75 + basement 140m² + garage 56m²59
29.06.2023Position of garage on property, specification in development plan22
03.08.2024Nice plot of land, but is the development plan too restrictive?21
26.03.2025Orientation of single-family house + garage on west-east plot with street on the west18

Oben