Is something missing?
Yes. The building application form with the check marks in the correct places and the question(s) to be clarified.
Or is that already too much?
Maybe. If you do not ask any concrete questions at all or if you ask questions about the extent of the structural use, i.e., for example, how large or how high the building may be, or questions otherwise requiring answers beyond the three aspects without authorization for submission mentioned in the state building code (type of structural use, construction method, buildable plot area), the authority will probably reject your application due to formal errors.
... that an architect is definitely required for the preliminary inquiry.
This statement is neither false nor true but requires further explanation.
for example 8 m x 10 m
As soon as the dimensions appear without comment, this can be interpreted as a question about the size of the building volume and thus require building submission authorization. If, on the other hand, you only ask about the permissibility of the location of the sketched building volume, it concerns the buildable area, which does not require a building submission authorized person.
As you can see, it is not quite simple, and the authorities therefore advise early involvement of professionals rather than struggling for weeks with deficient construction submissions and incomprehensible builders. With the statement
that it concerns development according to Paragraph 34.
and the images shown here, I consider the plot to be buildable with 99.9% probability and therefore the investment in someone who knows about this worthwhile.