Pablo84
2025-08-30 11:39:27
- #1
Wow, I’m just surprised by the number and quality of the friendly responses in such a short time. Big thank you.
Ah, I knew I had forgotten something. Good point. Yes, we are not buying because it’s a matter of the heart and we both have always wanted to own a house. We would also continue to rent. At the same time, we have very specific ideas about the location. And, surprisingly, there is simply nothing to rent in this area. And if there is, the rents are very high, you have to expect rent increases, etc. The alternative would be to move further out. Then you could probably rent more relaxed and be in a better situation (able to choose an apartment/house, move out if necessary and rent elsewhere, less worry about increases, termination for own use, etc.) In summary, our “problem” is that we want to stay near the big city. Oh, and the fundamental “why” is also that we want to offer the children a nice room each and a nice area to grow up in. We could probably live more modestly ourselves. But from 4 rooms in an acceptable area, it inevitably gets expensive, whether rent or purchase.
Thanks for the input. Yes, I often think that too. In both scenarios you spend a lot of money. It would be a shame, or almost dangerous, if you (to save money) are unhappy and still have a considerable amount "on your back."
Thank you very much. That gives courage. Somehow, from the numbers it also makes rational sense to me that we can afford it. On the other hand, I then think we can’t really spend 3,800–4,000 on a loan? “Who does that? That’s two net salaries,” and you haven’t even factored in ancillary costs yet. Somehow it sounds surreal.
Well, we do spend money but many hobbies don’t cost that much. We also spend little money on clothing. Fortunately, my wife doesn’t buy brand clothing. But I probably have to take another look at the expense calculation. I calculated a bit more pessimistically this morning. For example, a line item for “improvements and projects” is missing, which should be considered when you have a house and garden.
Here, too, you hit the nail on the head again. I can provide some more context here. The saving actually does not come from a feeling of fear but the desire to have as much flexibility and freedom as possible. It has given me a lot mentally at work to know that I have money in the background in case I want to reduce my hours or even quit the job to do something less “lucrative.” Then there is the thought that I still have the dream to maybe reduce significantly or retire in my mid-50s or 60s and sail around the world (I am a sailor, but currently fortunately don’t own a boat... and am more than happy with that). At least I don’t want to completely block this dream. The more I invest, the bigger the financial cushion and the higher the probability to live that dream at some point. By the way, this all sounds very decadent but I come from normal circumstances and my sailing trip would not be a “luxury yacht around the world” but of course such a project still costs a lot.
One has to say that I still have very young children at 40 and I can realistically say that before 60 it probably won’t happen anyway. And then one could rethink what to do with the property when the children move out. We can well imagine selling the house then. Phew sorry it’s getting more detailed and personal :D
May I ask again, why? Why property? Why a house?
Ah, I knew I had forgotten something. Good point. Yes, we are not buying because it’s a matter of the heart and we both have always wanted to own a house. We would also continue to rent. At the same time, we have very specific ideas about the location. And, surprisingly, there is simply nothing to rent in this area. And if there is, the rents are very high, you have to expect rent increases, etc. The alternative would be to move further out. Then you could probably rent more relaxed and be in a better situation (able to choose an apartment/house, move out if necessary and rent elsewhere, less worry about increases, termination for own use, etc.) In summary, our “problem” is that we want to stay near the big city. Oh, and the fundamental “why” is also that we want to offer the children a nice room each and a nice area to grow up in. We could probably live more modestly ourselves. But from 4 rooms in an acceptable area, it inevitably gets expensive, whether rent or purchase.
I would choose the A location. You are in such a financially comfortable situation that it’s only about life satisfaction now. The "few euros" (in your situation) you save by going for the B location are not worth giving up the nicest spot.
Thanks for the input. Yes, I often think that too. In both scenarios you spend a lot of money. It would be a shame, or almost dangerous, if you (to save money) are unhappy and still have a considerable amount "on your back."
That is a very comfortable situation. Provided there is a bit of willingness to take risks.
I’ll go straight for it:
880k - 200k equity = 680k to finance. (75k equity kept in reserve)
With the above assumed numbers, this would result in a monthly payment of about €3,860.
Even if I only assume €9,000 net household income, there is still just over €5,000 left for living and saving.
€5,000 is a number many can only dream of!
Thank you very much. That gives courage. Somehow, from the numbers it also makes rational sense to me that we can afford it. On the other hand, I then think we can’t really spend 3,800–4,000 on a loan? “Who does that? That’s two net salaries,” and you haven’t even factored in ancillary costs yet. Somehow it sounds surreal.
Way too much time wasted on text ;)
You can afford whatever you want (at least almost). The only question is whether you want it.
But if you live a minimalist lifestyle, why work so much and not also spend the money sometimes?
Banks welcome such privileged customers with open arms. Whether you want to finance 500k, 750k, a million, or more.
Well, we do spend money but many hobbies don’t cost that much. We also spend little money on clothing. Fortunately, my wife doesn’t buy brand clothing. But I probably have to take another look at the expense calculation. I calculated a bit more pessimistically this morning. For example, a line item for “improvements and projects” is missing, which should be considered when you have a house and garden.
I think so, too,
You can also afford the A location. (By the way, I would choose the A location because of the energy rating.)
However, I cannot tell if you even value a house and the comfort that comes with it. The most important parameter is actually missing from both options, namely the size of the lot.
And then there is the gut feeling, which should also have a say in the decision.
Living is more than just “use.”
And somewhere I read a bit of unease.
How does it come that you are so afraid of not saving enough, to provide several times for life and old age?
You know yourself that everything is already very well provided for – why doubt, not recognize the value, and get into the spiral of not allowing yourself anything from your savings? ETFs are a means to an end, not the purpose of life.
By the way, I recommend risk insurance to secure the partner.
Here, too, you hit the nail on the head again. I can provide some more context here. The saving actually does not come from a feeling of fear but the desire to have as much flexibility and freedom as possible. It has given me a lot mentally at work to know that I have money in the background in case I want to reduce my hours or even quit the job to do something less “lucrative.” Then there is the thought that I still have the dream to maybe reduce significantly or retire in my mid-50s or 60s and sail around the world (I am a sailor, but currently fortunately don’t own a boat... and am more than happy with that). At least I don’t want to completely block this dream. The more I invest, the bigger the financial cushion and the higher the probability to live that dream at some point. By the way, this all sounds very decadent but I come from normal circumstances and my sailing trip would not be a “luxury yacht around the world” but of course such a project still costs a lot.
One has to say that I still have very young children at 40 and I can realistically say that before 60 it probably won’t happen anyway. And then one could rethink what to do with the property when the children move out. We can well imagine selling the house then. Phew sorry it’s getting more detailed and personal :D