Bank withdraws financing commitment due to defects

  • Erstellt am 2024-04-12 14:19:16

nordanney

2024-04-15 14:30:57
  • #1
Fair is probably fair. Yes, it can. Because it assumes a defect-free property. Age-typical signs of wear are taken into account through the age-related depreciation. But here it is about specific structural damages that are named. Thus, a deterioration of the property. And then the bank may terminate. As always: talking helps. But not only when the horse has already bolted. Common sense already says that if structural damages appear in the purchase contract (and according to OP not only moisture and mold but also other defects that are not even mentioned here), everyone really stumbles over that and wonders whether it is even a habitable wreck or whether hundreds of thousands of euros in renovation costs are necessary (exaggeratedly formulated).
 

Winniefred

2024-04-15 14:32:38
  • #2
The OP doesn't seem to care about it anymore anyway.
 

hanghaus2023

2024-04-16 14:28:17
  • #3
Given the statements that were partly below the belt, I can understand that. The OP probably has quite different worries at the moment.
 

Winniefred

2024-04-16 16:19:13
  • #4
Well, it is becoming increasingly fashionable to ask questions and then simply disappear into the void. He did ask here - if he had other worries, he could have spared himself that. I am now only reluctantly answering and take the time for it because often there is simply no feedback anymore. Of course, I still wish the OP all the best and that a solution can be found for the problem, but it is still not the proper English way.
 

Finch039

2024-04-16 16:28:19
  • #5
These are all defects to be fixed (probably sealing), and I guess the house is probably not about to collapse, right? So fix the defects and that's it - the bank should be willing to negotiate before it just withdraws the financing commitment. Of course, that's their right, but a bank entrusted with the financing of such a project should be somewhat aware of its responsibility and first clarify in detail what exactly is going on. Honestly: Such a bank will leave you hanging at the first opportunity when life gets difficult and maybe not everything goes according to plan. Find yourself a sensible partner. For me, it was very important during my financing to have people who are available to me locally and at any time and who take care of my worries and problems. That's why it became the local house bank - it's not always about the last 0.1% interest ;)
 

Hausi77

2024-04-18 19:40:16
  • #6
First of all, thank you very much for your feedback. I was certainly aware that it would vary, but some things can also be expressed more diplomatically. Since I work full-time, the primary concern initially had to be the financing.

Regarding your responses:

I am of course aware that the bank wants collateral for the loan, and the necessary renovations were of course taken into account in the purchase price, but there was apparently a lack of communication because according to the bank advisor, when the word mold is mentioned, the initial reaction is always no; the bank also said they could have handled this better.

Since there is now a new status, I would like to give an update:

The moisture damage is more than just a spot on a wall, but this was of course considered in the purchase price. There are other defects, but these are insignificant in comparison. There is considerable additional equity available for the renovation since the house is intended to be renovated and refurbished before moving in (this was always planned anyway, as we certainly did not want to move into a house with moisture and mold). The old rental agreement therefore still runs for 6 to 9 months before the move is planned.

The additional capital was known to the bank, but the intended use was not.

The solution with the bank will now be that part of the equity goes into an account at the bank and the companies will be paid from there, and in return, the actual loan will be provided as approved. A real estate agent from the bank’s real estate department conducted an inspection beforehand so that the bank would have its own valuation basis in order to reach a solution as quickly as possible.

That’s the overview; if you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me.
 

Similar topics
01.05.2013No equity / existing consumer loans / financing possible?11
21.08.2014Is financing without equity realistic?19
27.10.2014Fixed interest rate financing without equity?20
16.02.2015Financing with equity15
21.02.2015Impacts on loan when equity is in property17
18.03.2015Buying property feasible - Loan with building savings as equity?12
18.12.2015Financing unequal equity ratios of unmarried partners24
20.07.2015Moisture/Mold in the basement10
15.09.2016Financing without equity with security?52
21.04.2016Is financing with land and equity possible like this?20
14.05.2016House purchase: Financing (with/without equity)24
25.05.2016Financing without equity - Repayment / Interest63
26.07.2016Calculation of equity capital in connection with KfW loan28
29.05.2021Enough equity? Will we even get a loan?30
10.11.20202 (dream) properties - financing unclear. Save equity?40
31.12.2020Land purchase with varied financing - is it sensible to hold back equity?10
26.06.2021How much equity is needed for home purchase financing?15
01.07.2021Financing / Equity / Granny Flat - Fundamental Thoughts48
11.06.2022Use of Credit vs. Equity41

Oben