haydee
2019-10-30 22:39:34
- #1
High ongoing costs. Suitable maximally in passive houses. Even we have not installed a classic air-to-air heat pump.
Read up on the topic yourself and browse this forum. It has been discussed several times.
Air-water heat pumps
Work with a refrigerant cycle and compressor. This way, enough energy for heating can be generated even at slight sub-zero temperatures.
The room temperature is usually supplied by a water-based system, typically underfloor heating
(Water is a better heat carrier than air)
Air-to-air heat pump draws in supply air (without refrigerant and compressor). Usually uses heat recovery (Wärmerückgewinnung) to warm the supply air. If that is not enough, additional heating is done with electricity (hair dryer).
Higher acquisition costs vs. higher operating costs.
Read up on the topic yourself and browse this forum. It has been discussed several times.
Air-water heat pumps
Work with a refrigerant cycle and compressor. This way, enough energy for heating can be generated even at slight sub-zero temperatures.
The room temperature is usually supplied by a water-based system, typically underfloor heating
(Water is a better heat carrier than air)
Air-to-air heat pump draws in supply air (without refrigerant and compressor). Usually uses heat recovery (Wärmerückgewinnung) to warm the supply air. If that is not enough, additional heating is done with electricity (hair dryer).
Higher acquisition costs vs. higher operating costs.