Are we crazy? Is this doable? Risk too high?

Especially since you couldn't manage it at all without your girlfriends

1) they could pay it without partners anyway
2) the conditions are very clear
3) the partners contributed nothing (the property came from the siblings' family)

Why should the siblings’ family give anything to the children’s partners?! I don’t understand.

If it bothers the partners, then they can rent an apartment and live separately. But then they pay double and have no home life.

The women contribute nothing in this case and want (if that’s how it is) half of the property gifted to them. Yeah right.

If the partners want to be in the land register, which I can absolutely understand and find okay, then they have to pay for it. End of story, Minimaus.

If there are still people who handle it differently, that’s great for the gold diggers.
But then please don’t complain that the partner (whether man or woman) caused the whirlwind and everything is gone.

That then goes under the guise of “love” and “romance.”

Funny how this always only has to come from one side.

If the partners love the siblings, why aren’t they romantic sometimes and prove their love by paying for the house alone?
That would be a real proof of love and truly very romantic.

Really funny to see how the women and white knights here get upset about a logical division...

With the salary, the brothers will not get 600k

If the partners want to be entered in the land register, which I can absolutely understand and also find okay, then they have to pay for it. End of story from Minimaus.

No one is objecting to that.

But it was implied in your earlier comment that the ladies could pay rent (argument: they would have to do so elsewhere anyway) and still not be entered in the land register.

Fair is only
a) Sharing ancillary costs equally, but giving up the land register entry, or
b) Paying rent and thus contributing to the loan, but then also being entered in the land register.

If you want the combination of a) and b), then only with business partners, not with life partners.

And that only holds logically as long as there are no children and their care involved, where women often secure their husbands' performance at work through de facto unpaid labor.

So it’s not all that clear and simple.

And if is right and the ladies’ income is needed for the loan, a) is not an option anyway.

You can contractually separate the unilaterally contributed land from the shared house to possibly defuse points of conflict in advance.

One can contractually separate the property unilaterally contributed from the shared house to possibly defuse points of contention in advance.

That is a good approach. It makes sense. I just can't stand it when one party (whether man or woman) contributes a lot upfront and the other party is supposed to benefit from it forever without any ifs or buts. So, if the property clearly belongs to the siblings by notarized deed and the house is paid for by all parties, then that is a somewhat "fairer" arrangement. In case of dispute, it is then "clearer" who gets what and no one feels cheated.

That is a good approach. It makes sense. I just can't stand it when one party (whether man or woman) puts in a lot upfront and the other party benefits from it forever without any ifs or buts. So, if the property clearly belongs to the siblings notarized and the house is paid for by all parties, then that's a somewhat "fairer" story. In case of dispute, it is then "clearer" who gets what and no one feels cheated.

I love these matter-of-fact partnerships. That is yours / that is mine. A woman is usually always disadvantaged when children come into play. Loss of income, keeping your back clear so the man earns money and being disadvantaged in retirement. That’s why I cherish my loving partnership. Everything together

No

As long as you are together, everything belongs to everyone.

As soon as you separate (if it unfortunately has to be), then there is no stress (or less).
It's that easy.

And if a partner decides to stay at home to live their life the way they envision it, then that's just how it is. With all the consequences.

As I said... as long as you are together, everything is fine.

The times when men usually fall for the romantic spiel are over.

A triple hip hip hooray for equality and emancipation