Baufuchs15
2016-02-29 14:43:27
- #1
Thank you very much for the assessment. I did not quite understand the comment about the party wall. Depending on the building material used, this is constructed differently.
With Liapor, it will be 24cm LAC 8 plus 12cm mineral wool instead of 42.5cm. (plus plaster each) The thinner wall has better sound insulation. The mineral wool is supposed to compensate for the thermal insulation.
With solid wood, 22cm wood plus 4 cm mineral wool, otherwise 29cm solid wood (plus plaster each).
With the timber frame, it is 42.5cm with the same construction as the other exterior walls including plaster.
Why am I comparing apples with oranges? I am looking for the cheapest provider for a mid-terrace house of a certain quality level. These are now offers with different materials because I also wanted to see whether they differ significantly in price.
The prices seem very high to me. My colleagues who have built in recent years paid much less per m², so I wonder if I have any significant cost drivers in the requirements. It cannot be that you have to put almost 500,000 on the table for a mid-terrace house without having a sauna or pool or any design elements installed. Have prices exploded like this? Are there differences whether you build in the countryside or in metropolitan areas?
Would it be somehow possible to build the above house for 350,000 including ancillary building costs?
With Liapor, it will be 24cm LAC 8 plus 12cm mineral wool instead of 42.5cm. (plus plaster each) The thinner wall has better sound insulation. The mineral wool is supposed to compensate for the thermal insulation.
With solid wood, 22cm wood plus 4 cm mineral wool, otherwise 29cm solid wood (plus plaster each).
With the timber frame, it is 42.5cm with the same construction as the other exterior walls including plaster.
Why am I comparing apples with oranges? I am looking for the cheapest provider for a mid-terrace house of a certain quality level. These are now offers with different materials because I also wanted to see whether they differ significantly in price.
The prices seem very high to me. My colleagues who have built in recent years paid much less per m², so I wonder if I have any significant cost drivers in the requirements. It cannot be that you have to put almost 500,000 on the table for a mid-terrace house without having a sauna or pool or any design elements installed. Have prices exploded like this? Are there differences whether you build in the countryside or in metropolitan areas?
Would it be somehow possible to build the above house for 350,000 including ancillary building costs?