HilfeHilfe
2021-06-01 08:59:42
- #1
That's right! He gets good money for his performance!
The forms of visualization are different, and not every client is grateful for this form. In my opinion, a form compatible with laypersons would be a text format with one sheet per week, divided into 1. a list of the projects to be carried out as planned; 2. explained deviations from the plan; and 3. measures to restore plan congruence (with a success report). So, for example, trade H will be there and is supposed to take four days; trade I has to postpone its arrival; trade J cannot yet carry out its planned work because of this, but will already come to chisel away what trade G built too wide. The plan for the next week can be executed as intended. Trade I will come three weeks later. Trade J will return for its planned work in four weeks because it follows trade I but has no time in three weeks. Reading this from a bar matrix requires practice, which one cannot assume in a layperson client – which the single-family house client usually is :)and yesterday late in the evening sent a schedule. It looks just as I imagined (a Gantt chart with all upcoming steps).
Das aus einer Balkenmatrix herauszulesen, braucht Übung, die man beim Laienbauherren - was der Einfamilienhaus-Bauherr ja meistens ist - nicht voraussetzen kann
I already said that what distinguishes the plan from a report is that the plan is active. A plan that only works under the unlikely condition of zero deviation or does not provide effective corrective measures for deviations is worthless. That is neither a plan nor a report, but a wish protocol.Interim status: we have received a schedule. Although it still needs to be corrected and supplemented in one or two places, it at least represents a starting point. At the moment, there is a problem with the screed layer, hopefully that won't throw everything into chaos again.
Similar topics | ||
10.02.2020 | Must the construction company itemize the costs per trade? | 13 |
22.04.2021 | Costs for the heating & sanitary trade | 86 |