American house - Which house builder is recommended?

oh, if only he had taken the steps and let down his hair like Rapunzel, then he would have ..... seen a hint of nothing from the house. But he could definitely have discovered houses far away from the WW over the heights in the distances. Depending on the bet and eyeball quality, also in the Eifel, at the Hohe Acht there are said to be houses as well.

He was probably on the tower - by the way also on that of Burg Olbrück and enjoyed the fact that the view there swept into the distance and still caught the cooling tower of Mülheim-Kärlich - but as for his hair, it is now a thing of the past. And the quality of the eyeballs, well, the trend is towards bifocal lenses. From a rain walk at the Hohe Acht, probably already undertaken in August, our bones are still almost wet today. From your house, at his last ascent of the observation tower, there was only the base plate - he does not remember having spotted it from there. With the question whether one could "see" the house from there, he meant more precisely whether its blue shone all the way there.

You really have to bring the axe in the forest with you for a blue light to appear to you. Whether this then happens because of a sighted supposed blue of a house or rather due to physical weakness of eyeballs, which even bifocal glasses, whose owner I am alongside the non-blue house, can no longer compensate for, ... the sentence is getting too long for me. So no, it is not visible. Maybe you spot parts of the I-convert-sun-rays-into-electricity modules. If you give me a signal in time, I can also respond with corresponding smoke signals. However, here in this part of the WW (and also in others that I have inhabited and experienced) we have already switched to more modern communication. But up to now I do not even know (of course only due to lack of research skills) from which part of the district you escape when you climb towers.

You really have to bring the axe into the forest for a blue light to appear to you. Whether this then is due to a spotted supposed blue of a house or rather due to physical weakness of eyeballs, which even bifocal lenses, whose owner is, besides the non-blue house, likewise, can no longer compensate for... the sentence is getting too long.

Not blue? I would even consider as Light blue – I suppose I should visit there again (which we do not do too enthusiastically due to the miserably sparse hiking trail signage).

From which part of the district you escape when you climb towers.

In any case, I escape if my destination is the observation tower right next to the cemetery, in the part whose name you want to keep secret hereafter.

Hello, we also want to build a wooden house in the New England style and initially thought of Greenville. I would be interested to know what exactly stopped you from choosing Greenville.

We decided against Greenville because the planning contract was very expensive and opaque. For example, I didn’t know whether we could also build with other providers using the plans. Additionally, they couldn’t tell us which company would actually build the house in the end. Furthermore, the whole thing looks like a one-man show. But stylistically, the houses are really great. We also looked at one.

For example, I did not know whether we could also build with other providers using the plans. In addition, no one could tell us which company would ultimately build the house at all.

These two sentences actually contradict each other: because generally the construction of a house that is essentially "wooden" is very specific, since the "systems" of industrial wooden builders are too incompatible with each other. Building according to the plans of manufacturer X with manufacturer Y is practically impossible in this respect. Such planning can ultimately only be "taken over" by a provider working in a craft-like manner. Within the world of stone houses it is much easier, implementation-wise, to "change horses midstream." That is why in such threads, with the core desire for a special house design usually developed as wooden, it is often advised to switch to a stone-based implementation with only wooden visual "coachwork." For a provider of wooden dream house implementations, it follows accordingly that he must have thoroughly worked out his product down to the details of realization. Of course, he can leave open until the tender which carpenter is to perform the execution. However, he must offer a detailed set of plans and an appropriately experienced construction management – otherwise I would assume he must be dealing in hollow promises. What is the current status of your implementation efforts (when I quickly skimmed back, I found only several mentions of unfortunately not chosen paths, but none ultimately taken or whether such has now been found)?