Aerated concrete or sand-lime brick with external thermal insulation composite system (ETICS) made of polystyrene

  • Erstellt am 2019-04-26 20:15:43

Tego12

2019-04-27 12:13:11
  • #1
Since insulation has no effect on the air exchange of a modern house, your choice has no impact on issues like mold and moisture problems inside. It is always a matter of proper ventilation in airtight houses, which all must be by law....

If one thinks they are doing something good for the environment by choosing mineral wool instead of EPS... you can do that. But it does not change the fact that the house is airtight per se or have any impact on mold etc. inside. The durability... Both options will outlast you by far. Here I could mention the Frauenhofer study again... In 40-year-old ETICS buildings there are absolutely no signs of material fatigue... zero! The stuff probably lasts longer than the stone behind it.
 

Wugler1978

2019-04-27 17:45:34
  • #2
Insulation with stone wool etc. is more expensive for us than Ytong. Therefore, in this case we would build monolithically.
 

Mycraft

2019-04-27 17:54:09
  • #3
Use sand-lime brick+polystyrene. Properly processed, you have nothing to worry about for decades, including health-wise, and you also get better sound insulation.
 

CoolCat

2019-04-27 17:59:44
  • #4
I don't want to spam the thread now, but is it really as described?

Meaning that the claims of higher durability and indoor climate benefits of stone wool are not true?

Then you can save your money.
 

Tego12

2019-04-27 18:01:45
  • #5
Do you also believe that Nimm 2 is full of good vitamins, or that Kinder chocolate is healthy because of the extra portion of milk? At least that’s what the advertising says.

How is the stone wool supposed to change the indoor climate? There is no contact with the interior, nor does it affect the air exchange.

Durability... No idea, but EPS will outlive you... Even if stone wool lasts 200 years instead of 100... (I have no idea...)... Where is the advantage?
 

CoolCat

2019-04-27 18:16:05
  • #6
I look at the features and question them. Especially in the construction sector, there are various philosophies and preferences, so as a layperson, one initially only tentatively absorbs this. For me as a layperson, Styrofoam simply seems more sealed than mineral wool, but I rely on personal perception in my areas of expertise.
 

Similar topics
20.11.2012General questions about insulation10
21.08.2014Insulation on upper floor concrete ceiling / roof by own work - vapor barrier?10
10.03.2015Skepticism regarding ETICS on new multi-family residential buildings40
13.09.2016Insulation under the floor slab EPS or XPS?12
10.11.2017Hollow bricks and mineral insulation unfavorable?18
06.02.2018The vapor barrier has a brownish position, insulation is wet27
29.12.2020Y-Tong vs Concrete without extra insulation in practice (heating costs)38
13.04.2020Insulation in the construction trailer, vapor barrier yes/no?12
09.03.2021Reinforce floor slab insulation, reduce heat entry into the upper floor13
27.05.2021How do I keep mold away from the attic?31
22.08.2021House renovation, year of construction 68, mold and co76
22.07.2022Insulation for the top floor ceiling - which material?14
02.10.2022Is insulating the exterior wall sensible or not?20
24.03.2023Work on basement ceiling insulation with stone wool48
16.12.2022Forgot insulation on the dormer wall - mold on wood - what to do?13
28.03.2023Scrape off old EPS facade insulation22
21.09.2024Insulate the stairwell wall in the attic?13
29.11.2024Mold due to residual construction moisture or insulation problem?10
03.01.2025Does mold go away by insulation or not?18

Oben