Andreas_79
2020-06-02 15:07:42
- #1
It doesn't seem that simple after all...
1. The cable looks unsightly on the property and it would be desirable for it to be removed.
2. Felling the trees will not go along with the cables without a danger felling, and that will surely be expensive, because there are too many trees. The fire department was a good suggestion, I will try it if there is no other option, but it would be better to remove the cable.
Our wish is, of course, to have a property without cables. The cables are not registered in the land register, I just double-checked that.
What Google has now taught me is that there is a ruling from the BGH that you have to tolerate the cable if you yourself are a consumer of it. But we won’t be building for at least two years, so we are not consumers...
Oh, this is not starting off well... The appointment with the notary is in the next few days and I already have the first problem here :-(
The worst thing that can happen would be that I have to remove the cables at my own expense, which I do not want since that surely won’t be cheap. The best would be if the electricity provider does it upon my request, which seems rather unlikely.
So [legal protection insurance] and talking to a lawyer about what they recommend, I don’t want to bother the neighbors yet since we haven’t signed anything, but I would do that as a second step, although no one will be happy if I ring the doorbell and say “Hello, I am the new owner, those cables over there have to go and you have to pay for it.”
I think the best would be to consult a specialist lawyer and hear their opinion, preferably the electricity provider would have to do it.
Best regards
Andreas
1. The cable looks unsightly on the property and it would be desirable for it to be removed.
2. Felling the trees will not go along with the cables without a danger felling, and that will surely be expensive, because there are too many trees. The fire department was a good suggestion, I will try it if there is no other option, but it would be better to remove the cable.
Our wish is, of course, to have a property without cables. The cables are not registered in the land register, I just double-checked that.
What Google has now taught me is that there is a ruling from the BGH that you have to tolerate the cable if you yourself are a consumer of it. But we won’t be building for at least two years, so we are not consumers...
Oh, this is not starting off well... The appointment with the notary is in the next few days and I already have the first problem here :-(
The worst thing that can happen would be that I have to remove the cables at my own expense, which I do not want since that surely won’t be cheap. The best would be if the electricity provider does it upon my request, which seems rather unlikely.
So [legal protection insurance] and talking to a lawyer about what they recommend, I don’t want to bother the neighbors yet since we haven’t signed anything, but I would do that as a second step, although no one will be happy if I ring the doorbell and say “Hello, I am the new owner, those cables over there have to go and you have to pay for it.”
I think the best would be to consult a specialist lawyer and hear their opinion, preferably the electricity provider would have to do it.
Best regards
Andreas