10 years (0.99%) or 15 years (1.40%)?

  • Erstellt am 2019-02-24 13:40:07

Caspar2020

2019-02-24 18:46:17
  • #1


Without special repayments, I don’t find either the 10 years with 3.4 amortization or the 15 years with 3% appealing.

Either way, there would still be nearly 300K or 230K left to pay off.

What is the plan after the fixed interest period?

What are your options for real special repayments? Keep in mind that the house will always require money over the years.

Generally, different terms of components mean a certain commitment to the current institution. (unless they are full repayment components).

I’m thinking at least 15 years with an additional building savings contract as insurance.
 

ullw889

2019-02-24 19:10:00
  • #2


1.7k is 34% of our net income. Otherwise, there is only the paid-off land plus reserves of 12,000 that are not to be touched. We do not want to take 10 years but are looking for opinions for or against a “mixed” loan. That it is a gamble is clear. However, it is also a way to pay less interest, provided the bet pays off. We are aware of the remaining debt, but we will then also be 38/39 years old and a building savings contract is being saved in parallel (without an upfront fee due to the employer). Thanks for the open discussion.
 

ullw889

2019-02-24 19:19:58
  • #3


The building saver as insurance is in place and should at least reduce the interest rate risk between 60,000 (10 years) and 90,000 (15 years). At that time, we will be 38/39 years old and 43/44 years old respectively. Special repayment is possible up to 5% in this constellation. The current institution is my wife's employer. That simplifies many things but could of course be different in 10-15 years.
 

Calbe

2019-02-24 20:40:11
  • #4
Which bank?
 

KEVST

2019-02-24 21:03:56
  • #5


20 years for 1.4%? Details please
 

face26

2019-02-24 21:48:27
  • #6


With the ratio, I would definitely avoid 10 years. Save the installment in the building savings contract and increase the repayment. I already find 15 years harsh. I would rather mix 15 years with 20 or 25.

Edit: If you want to gamble, do everything on 20 years and save in stock funds instead of a building savings contract. You will probably end up better off.
 

Similar topics
30.10.2008Bank loan vs building savings contract?11
24.10.2014Repay savings or save? + Secure interest rate47
25.03.2015Financing exclusively through a building savings contract12
14.07.2020Beginnings of a possible property | Questions about the building savings contract72
16.09.2015Home bank financing, building society saver, repayment11
22.01.2017Which financing option, TH or building savings contract?23
18.08.2017No building savings/little equity and construction/purchase plans in the near future?18
18.01.2018Annuity loan vs. home savings contract - comprehension questions47
27.02.2018Old home savings contract - what should you do with it?31
28.05.2018Annuity loan vs. building savings contract 300k loan10
21.11.2018Financing with a building savings contract?18
04.07.2019TA loan with building saver - read a lot, yet did not find the catch.13
04.11.2019Ongoing home savings contract regarding special repayment and allocation maturity18
11.12.2020Reorganization of finances after house construction, building savings contract, occupational pension scheme, Riester15
11.01.2021Financing offer: TA loan with building savings contract24
06.07.2022How secure is the collateralization of the remaining debt via a home savings contract?17
15.12.2022Follow-up Financing 2030 Prepare Now Building Savings Contract/Special Repayment/Fixed Deposit64
06.03.2023Is a building savings contract with a high outstanding debt sensible as partial security?17
09.09.2024Bridge loan before allocation of home savings contract18
17.01.2025Financing offer single-family house including building savings, experiences25

Oben