Work contract with general contractor - questions about the offer

  • Erstellt am 2017-10-17 22:09:11

R.Hotzenplotz

2017-10-26 16:47:23
  • #1


Exactly. I just wonder whether there might possibly be "quasi-dependencies" if the contractor commissions DEKRA very frequently.



That would probably also have to be negotiated and agreed upon. The whole thing is called four-phase monitoring.
 

Bieber0815

2017-10-26 17:16:43
  • #2
Good question, difficult question. I would pay the 4000 euros as compensation for pain and suffering if I wanted to build with this general contractor. And then I would hire my own expert to supervise the construction and advise me. Or I would find a general contractor who does not necessarily offer a 4-phase model.
 

R.Hotzenplotz

2017-10-26 17:20:54
  • #3


So in other words, "joint commissioning" is not an option for you. I actually see it the same way. I also want to feel that someone is working for me.
 

11ant

2017-10-27 00:52:36
  • #4
An expert does not need to be partial – it is enough if he does his job properly. That’s why I say it depends on the assignment: if he is supposed to document everything, I see no "danger" – but only if he is also supposed to decide what he actually documents. If, at the other extreme, he is only supposed to prevent defects, then of course he has to be partial, and then for the client. I think the construction consultant can quite well compile where the potentially critical points are in this project. And one then states that their execution must be correspondingly tight or meticulously monitored. The less "leeway" the expert has, the less relevant it becomes which party he has known longer.
 

R.Hotzenplotz

2017-10-27 17:36:40
  • #5
The building surveyor is now out after some back and forth.
 

R.Hotzenplotz

2017-11-04 09:01:03
  • #6
We signed the contract yesterday.
 
Oben