11ant
2020-02-25 16:54:18
- #1
The numbers alone say nothing at first; that is just the construction depth of the profile being indicated. This can be reduced by fitting the sashes more flush, that is, by reducing the "overlap" between the opening sash and the frame (this is mostly what fans of slimmer profiles are concerned about, similar to "softer" edges). If the reduced construction depth results from overall more compact dimensions of all chambers, the profile can, of course, become more expensive at the same torsional stiffness: brains cost more than material. I suspect each of the two suppliers has reasons for their decision. These sometimes lie in the price difference (for stingy customers, the lower-priced profile is chosen), but sometimes also in the risk of complaints (if the frames turn out to be "floppier" or the fittings are subjected to more strain). Nobody will go to this effort just for 12 mm more space for bigger flower pots.
Can you also explain your statement
Can you also explain your statement
– do they really, and why?
Of course the 82-profile windows have a better Uw value.