muejoh
2015-07-29 13:21:08
- #1
Ultimately, 20 years are worthwhile if after 15 years the higher interest paid (20-year model) and the outstanding remaining repayment amount correspond to the value that can be obtained through saving in 15 years. Unfortunately, the average savings interest rate over the 15 years must then be about 2% above the fixed loan interest rate, and that is very unlikely from today's perspective. It is all theoretical anyway. Considering the difference, the model over 20 years is almost 33% more expensive compared to 15 years. Clearly, the factor of calmer repayment plays a role, although I have no qualms about either option; the only thing is that the spending situation can of course change, and then we are somewhat better/more flexible with 20 years. This week, we are going to the bank again, where all costs will be recalculated with the latest interest rates. Maybe there are other models that could be an option for us. Then it might of course no longer make sense to choose the 15 years. :)