Warm water circulation line: Is a check valve required?

  • Erstellt am 2014-02-10 23:01:49

Bauexperte

2014-02-13 11:03:34
  • #1
Hello Nordanney,

In your case, from my point of view, it is also not a classic circulation line that could significantly increase primary energy demand. You switch it on and off intentionally; although these switching times probably add up to some extent by the end of the day, overall it probably does not weigh heavily. Flow temperature. Therefore, your installer agreed. I wonder though - but I am also a technical novice - what actually switching it on brings you. The requested water then also has to be heated to a set temperature, meaning that cold water also flows out of the line beforehand? Rhenish greetings
 

nordanney

2014-02-13 11:40:02
  • #2

We do not want to keep the circulation line running around the clock either – that would really cost a lot of money!
It’s true, when we immediately turn on the tap, only cold water comes out at first. In the bathroom, for example, it’s rather the case that maybe you go to the toilet first and then turn on the water (and warm water is already there!) or maybe you wet the toothbrush first or...
In the kitchen it’s different, there you have to press a switch first. But that’s a matter of getting used to when you’re already standing in the kitchen, pressing the switch quickly.
Overall, situations should clearly predominate where warm water comes from the tap when you need it.
 

Wastl

2014-02-13 15:14:24
  • #3

That is why I asked my initial question: Is it possible to get KFW with a circulation pipe, since the primary energy demand (at least in our case) increases significantly because many losses occur due to "unnecessary" heating. And that does have something to do with KFW, right?
We do not have a circulation pipe; it was advised against from an energy perspective—which annoys me quite often because it takes longer for warm water to arrive, and I therefore waste water while showering.
 

Bauexperte

2014-02-13 16:41:33
  • #4
Hello Wastl,

based on my experience so far, it is not possible to take advantage of discounted loans from KfW for the reason you mentioned => higher primary energy demand.

Building expert, on the go
 

€uro

2014-02-13 19:30:02
  • #5
That is not correct. The decisive factor is the qp´´ value. This does worsen with circulation, but if the required value is still achieved, it is okay.
The circulation pump running continuously is a waste of energy. Time-based controls have proven effective.
Check valves or thermosiphons are not mandatory, but very useful!

Best regards.
 

Similar topics
19.06.2009Evaluation of the KfW 60 House Contract: Credit Check for House12
19.01.2013KfW 70 - which roller shutters in the new city villa?10
12.05.2014KfW 70 without ventilation system107
03.05.2011KfW loan okay or is there a cheaper option?10
21.08.2011Which heating system is suitable for our Kfw 70 house without a basement?15
10.07.2011Wall construction and insulation for Kfw 70 house, okay?19
07.10.2016Which heating is recommended for KfW 55?58
08.07.2012KfW 70 Ventilation / Exhaust System10
03.08.2015Semi-detached house with 2 residential units KFW10
29.01.2016Price difference new construction, KfW 70, KfW 5513
26.07.2016Calculation of equity capital in connection with KfW loan28
28.02.2019Construction costs: Single-family house in Baden-Württemberg 2019 (KFW 40 plus)35
17.01.2020KfW Efficiency House 40 Heating Heat Demand22
13.08.2019Can we still slip into a KfW-55 house?14
11.01.2021Bungalow expansion to single-family house - costs, KfW funding & planning12
28.03.2021KfW funding for 2-3 residential units possible despite self-use?10
04.11.2022Result of blower door test KfW 5521
12.05.2023Circulation pump & circulation line not installed33
02.01.2025Cost estimate for renovating a 1970s semi-detached house according to KfW or BAFA38

Oben