Waiver of right of way and easement - what are the consequences?

Is that correct

Without a plan, it can’t be answered, but it is certainly possible.

does a right of way and utility right have no influence on the building plot/building boundaries?

It has no influence on the building boundaries, since those are set in the development plan, provided one exists, but it does influence the actually buildable area.

We don’t want to put any obstacles in the seller’s way

That is commendable.

The owner also had himself very well paid for that.

I had the suspicion shortly before your last post. So I can leave it out now.

Do a right of way and utility right prevent any construction measures?

Possibly yes, but as you have marked it, it lies on the property boundary, from which distance must be kept anyway.

There is bound to be conflict with the new neighbor or the old one.

Everything in life costs, so I consider it naive to expect from the owner that the waiver would come for free. As we now know, he apparently did not grant this for free when it was registered, which is why I see it only as right and fair (sic!). Giving up obvious things just for the sake of peace brings nothing in my experience; moreover, the property owner could just as well accept, for the same reason, that there are conditions under which the right is deleted – which, in my reading, he will have to do anyway, unless it is gifted to him. Furthermore, there are even six privileged parcels if I interpret the sketch correctly, so this issue also applies to all of them and possibly not all will take the charitable path. ;)

why give up when he is gone anyway... the next buyer may possibly take it with the right of way

As I see your plan, the property that has the right of way registered is large, which means a multi-family house could be built there; as property owner number 6, this would need to be examined. I don't know how much money it would be worth to me to have such a block in front of my nose.

It has no impact on the building boundaries, as these are set in the development plan, if one exists, but it does affect the actually buildable area.

We should probably check that again, my drawing of the right of way and pipeline easement is a current assumption, since there are greenhouses on the rest of the property and there was no other place to realize a path.

Currently, houses 1 and 2, if he pays for it, would waive it, as they would have no disadvantages from the new owner's plans.

Can the current owner do anything with it if 2 parties waive and 4 do not? Or do all have to give their consent?

Why waive if he’s gone anyway... the next interested buyer might take the right of way with them

The current owner wants to sell it and the interested party only wants to buy if we waive the right of way and pipeline easement.

As I see your plan, the property on which the right of way is registered is large, meaning a multi-family house could be built there, as property owner number 6 this should be examined. I don’t know how much money it would be worth to me to have such a block right in front of my nose.

All 6 houses have the right of way. The property is about 1800 sqm. The existing house is on the other side.

We suspect that the interested party wants to renovate the existing house, tear down the greenhouses and build a multi-family house there.

House 6 would be hit the most, so to speak. And she doesn't want that possible block there at any price.

As we now know, he apparently did not grant this for free when registering it, which is why I see it only as fair and reasonable (sic!).

In this case, I agree with you! I was so naive and thought that the right of way and easement was registered free of charge.