Ventilation in new buildings (central vs. decentralized), noise disturbance

  • Erstellt am 2016-06-20 20:41:07

Deliverer

2016-06-21 14:26:02
  • #1
That's true. Best not at all. However, the OP "likes to keep the windows open" and therefore in my opinion does not need an expensive ventilation solution. Well – every system needs to be kept clean and maintained. (Filter replacement, cleaning/disinfection...) The bigger, more expensive and more complexly built it is, the higher the follow-up costs. For some (hay fever sufferers) it's worth it, for others (ventilating country dwellers) it just isn't. My decision was also strongly influenced by the additional cost of about 10,000 bucks (which would only have paid off after almost 30 years)... It's important not only to compare the pure system costs but also the changes in the statics, ceiling height, cutouts in coverings, etc.
 

Sebastian79

2016-06-21 14:29:35
  • #2


For example, when laying pipes in or on the raw concrete ceilings, nothing has to be boxed or suspended. And you can't just "turn up" one room there – everything is always "turned up".

Why would you insulate a house thoroughly and seal it airtight, only to then drill holes in the exterior walls? I will never understand that with decentralized devices in new buildings – not to mention the noise factor.
 

Deliverer

2016-06-21 14:32:12
  • #3
Because otherwise you suffocate?! You need fresh air with all systems, after all. I see little difference there now.
 

Sebastian79

2016-06-21 14:33:52
  • #4
That referred to decentralized systems (and especially) without heat recovery...
 

BastianB

2016-06-21 14:35:21
  • #5
Cleaning can usually be done in a few minutes per month. I suspect that with open windows, more dirt enters the apartment, and therefore the cleaning effort for the house itself is higher. Probably very few people will leave their windows open permanently, i.e. when you come home after a few hours: really stale air (I once turned off the ventilation system for a few hours as a test just for fun --> I will never do that again ). At first, we wanted to choose the solution "central exhaust + decentralized supply air," but for various reasons, we decided on "completely central." Despite the lack of a basis for comparison, I am very satisfied with this option.
 

Deliverer

2016-06-21 14:39:10
  • #6

My answer as well. Why should it be better to have one big hole instead of five small ones?

Regarding heat recovery, I have already said that with heating costs of 1000 to 1500 per year, it is hardly possible to save enough to make heat recovery cost-effective.
 

Similar topics
02.04.2012Ventilation with heat recovery in new buildings11
27.02.2015Burglary-proof windows?33
03.06.2014Interior design - windows14
18.06.2014Inspector defect identification, determination of window installation10
18.05.2016Help needed with window arrangement!32
27.05.2015Huge problem with condensation on the window34
20.12.2019Trefz window prices and experiences?14
26.01.2015Window between two rooms13
13.03.2015Opinions on window parapet height sought30
22.04.2015Window, roller shutter, exterior plaster10
15.09.2022Central controlled residential ventilation with heat recovery: Are rooms individually controllable?20
28.05.2015Round window - dissatisfied with the interior reveal16
07.01.2016Controlled residential ventilation yes - heat recovery no - justification in the text!79
26.04.2016Warm bedroom in the house with ventilation including heat recovery24
03.04.2018New building KfW55 with gas, solar, and controlled residential ventilation with heat recovery43
21.12.2017Energy saving regulation with gas boiler and heat recovery ventilation instead of solar?15
27.11.2017Ventilation system with heat recovery, installation location temperature11
09.01.2018Nilan ventilation system with controlled heat recovery29
14.09.2020Experiences with central exhaust system without heat recovery30
30.04.2019Heat pump or gas with central ventilation system with heat recovery16

Oben