Hello,
I don’t like to be the spoilsport. Of course, you can look at what I get on the market for a 1000 € installment. But I wouldn’t adapt the building size to the loan; instead, I would analyze what space / features I need. You should never primarily be driven by money.
I see it differently - due to my profession - and in this point I agree with the user "Dirk Grafe"; I would even go so far as to say that this is the only viable way.
Am I really too cautious?
No, in my view rather not. However, 170 sqm of living space is also quite a number that needs to be paid for. That raises the question for me whether it really has to be that much; and whether you have an idea of what 170 sqm/Living Space means. In this point "HilfeHilfe" is right again; clarifying the room program provides relief.
I would like to strongly recommend you have a conversation with an independent financing broker you trust and talk to him about the maximum you / you all can bear. When you have this number, deduct a part of it that really should be reserved for emergencies. Then subtract the costs of the plot as well as the typical additional construction costs, and then you know exactly what your dream house may cost.
This recommendation:
... defensively calculated including equity approx. 450,000 €. From this sum you deduct 10-15% as a buffer and tell the architect that you want/can spend 375,000-400,000 € including the plot.
should not lead you to assume that architects or house sellers are stupid people. They are definitely not; I do not know any architect or seller who is not aware of this approach by potential home builders. This ultimately leads to plans often being made larger - and thus also the price in the bottom right, because the architect / seller acts according to the motto "he has more money available than he wants me to believe". This is an endless spiral and I by no means tend to place the blame - if you want to call it that - exclusively on the side of the architect / seller.
I always appreciate an open conversation. When a prospect comes to me and says, "
this and that" is my idea, "
this" is my budget, and "
that" is my iron reserve, I know where I stand and can plan accordingly. I also have no problem talking a prospect out of some things that I know he cannot handle; which might be economically nonsense. But for that, a basis of trust must exist, otherwise I can save myself the effort. That does not necessarily mean that I can also win this prospect as my customer - I am rarely the only contact person; but it makes the talks more pleasant and leads to the goal. Nothing is worse than that unconfirmed gut feeling "
I am being lied to"; that silently degrades me to the willing idiot who is unfortunately needed for house building. A temporary partnership on equal footing looks different, because that is what building a house means.
Ownership also means a form of restricting the quality of life.
I fully agree with that.
Rhenish greetings