Thorny tree hedge - the city as an encroaching neighbor

  • Erstellt am 2017-04-26 13:09:52

Lückenfüller

2017-04-26 23:15:33
  • #1


Actually awkwardly phrased, you understood it correctly.



Indeed the min/max is missing. So, no "mistake" was probably made here if the plant grows higher.



Good tips, thank you very much!

: That’s exactly what I find exciting, I’ve heard similar things. I don’t yet know whether the minimum boundary applies here.
 

kaho674

2017-04-27 07:50:03
  • #2
A blackberry hedge is really quite nasty. Only talking helps here. I would insist that the city adhere to a maximum height and width. Then it is also responsible for the trimming. Otherwise, the berries are of course tasty and healthy!
 

Escroda

2017-04-27 08:43:08
  • #3

As already wrote, statements without knowledge of a development plan excerpt and the exact wording of the textual determinations are hardly possible. If the development plan sets a planting obligation, this takes precedence over neighbor law.

You might even be glad that planting has already taken place, since otherwise you would have to take care of the planting yourself.

It must be checked whether it really is public ground. Not every property owned by the municipality is automatically public. Traffic areas, for example, must be designated as public. Is the meadow to be preserved designated as a public green area in the development plan?

... on someone else’s property? He really seems to be shameless.
 

Lückenfüller

2017-04-27 09:03:52
  • #4


 

kaho674

2017-04-27 09:12:25
  • #5
Well, in my opinion, that doesn't look so good. They have you surrounded there and have made that official right away. I think if you buy it after that has been decided, you have to live with it. But I've really never seen anything like that. It's right on the border, isn't it? And so massive. Are other properties also affected that strongly? I mean, I'm always in favor of greenery, but big trees so close to the house, you just don't do that anyway.
 

Escroda

2017-04-27 10:09:33
  • #6
Although I was not familiar with the term Heister until an hour ago, I want to speculate: The property boundary is identical to the usage boundary (Knödellinie) in the development plan. The planting requirement thus only applies to the municipal property, which is designated as public green space according to the planning symbol ordinance. The city is and remains the owner of the meadow and is responsible for the maintenance and care of the hedge. If the hedge exceeds a height of 2m, the city must ensure it is cut back to 1.50m. What do you mean by both sides? Were the tree saplings planted only recently and are 2m tall? Were the thorn bushes also planted? We have a beech hedge on the boundary. With regular cutting, I do not notice any significant trunk expansion. And the shading at 2m height would also be tolerable.
 

Similar topics
10.12.2012Terrain elevations in the development plan are incorrect.12
08.01.2014Opinions on the hillside property22
09.04.2014Questions/neglected plot/meadow, determining construction measures44
16.06.2015Take the property or wait and accept the risk?22
14.04.2015Uneconomic development plan31
21.12.2017Development plan - 1.5-story building?16
16.02.2016Regulations regarding development plans, any experiences?22
10.04.2016divide a long, narrow plot12
13.06.2016Build an investment property, despite a 1 1/2-story development plan11
25.07.2016Is a 3,000 sqm plot sensible?44
21.11.2016Buy land as land with development potential15
14.11.2016Horse chestnut in the development plan13
18.11.2016Small plot - does it suit us?11
27.02.2017Determination of land value of property with existing old structure25
03.05.2017Is terrain modeling allowed on the property?20
05.10.2017Property / Development Plan / Retaining Walls / Excavations17
15.08.2018Basic floor area ratio / floor area ratio for plots without a development plan: How to calculate? Experiences?18
30.01.2022Plot 4500 m² (nursery) - preparation of development plan independently16
29.06.2023Position of garage on property, specification in development plan22
03.08.2024Nice plot of land, but is the development plan too restrictive?21

Oben