Hello Karsten, I understand what you mean. The problem I only see is that of misunderstandings. And they do exist – also with honor and among friends. You can simply misunderstand each other or remember things discussed differently. One person assumes, simply put, that the garage door belongs to a garage, but the other said, no, it doesn’t, because I don’t even know what you like. In the best case, you discussed it and then remember that. Then everything is fine. It’s not about suspecting bad intentions on the other side. But misunderstandings do happen, and they can also become costly. And if you now consider a contract as nothing more than a piece of paper that simply records what was agreed upon, to avoid any misunderstandings, then I see no problem with that. I fully agree with you on unilateral contracts; for mutually concluded agreements, to look back on what was discussed in case of misunderstanding, I find them rather helpful than bad. Has it never happened to you that you had a different memory of an event than, for example, your wife? That is simply because people focus on different things and remember them. That just happens... roughly understandable, what I mean?