Berlinho2
2022-11-30 16:15:01
- #1
Hello dear forum,
I have a signed construction contract and overlooked some fine print - yes, my fault!
My general contractor demands a security for payment claims amounting to 25% of the fixed price from me. This security can be provided in the form of a guarantee, an assignment, or a joint account. He wants to ensure that I don't buy a Porsche with the loan and that he ultimately gets paid for the services rendered. At the same time, a contract performance guarantee of 5% of the fixed price is granted.
I have now read through various threads, websites, and forums and I am still not really sure what the best option is for me to provide the desired security to the general contractor.
As I understand it, with the payment security I grant the general contractor access to about 100,000 EUR net (security for payment claims - contract performance guarantee) without having any security for the provision of services for that money. A friendly ING advisor told me that a guarantee would be free to set up, but the general contractor would then have access to the money at any time and I could hardly do anything against it. In the worst case, he performs services poorly or not at all, I refuse to pay, and he retrieves the money via the guarantee. I find that a very one-sided risk...
The advisor was not very familiar with the term "assignment," but alternatively suggested a "financing confirmation" and payment of invoices directly to the general contractor. Currently, the flow of money is: bank --> me --> general contractor.
With the joint account, I would probably have to draw an amount of around 125,000 EUR from the still interest-free loan and transfer it to another account. I would therefore have to pay interest on it already, which is why this option is not an option for me at all.
I have a signed construction contract and overlooked some fine print - yes, my fault!
My general contractor demands a security for payment claims amounting to 25% of the fixed price from me. This security can be provided in the form of a guarantee, an assignment, or a joint account. He wants to ensure that I don't buy a Porsche with the loan and that he ultimately gets paid for the services rendered. At the same time, a contract performance guarantee of 5% of the fixed price is granted.
I have now read through various threads, websites, and forums and I am still not really sure what the best option is for me to provide the desired security to the general contractor.
As I understand it, with the payment security I grant the general contractor access to about 100,000 EUR net (security for payment claims - contract performance guarantee) without having any security for the provision of services for that money. A friendly ING advisor told me that a guarantee would be free to set up, but the general contractor would then have access to the money at any time and I could hardly do anything against it. In the worst case, he performs services poorly or not at all, I refuse to pay, and he retrieves the money via the guarantee. I find that a very one-sided risk...
The advisor was not very familiar with the term "assignment," but alternatively suggested a "financing confirmation" and payment of invoices directly to the general contractor. Currently, the flow of money is: bank --> me --> general contractor.
With the joint account, I would probably have to draw an amount of around 125,000 EUR from the still interest-free loan and transfer it to another account. I would therefore have to pay interest on it already, which is why this option is not an option for me at all.
[*]Can you share your expertise on which option you consider the safest/most sensible for me as the client?
[*]For example, I don't know if I can limit access to the guarantee, like "only if I agree to the payout," are there any experiences with this?
[*]So: guarantee or assignment - what would you do?