11ant
2017-03-05 23:32:55
- #1
I was merely concerned here with the small joints between the stones. About 2-5mm in size. The head joints.[...] what is better: to leave them completely open and hope that the plaster solves the problem
Oh, then I am happy to revise my inquisitorial judgment and acquit your planner
So. if it is about 2 mm, then that corresponds to the nominal dimension of the head joints. With large format stones, it is common that the interlocking at the stone ends replaces the mortar joint and the head joints are regularly executed dry. Only where "cheating" occurs at this point (to patch up the said irregular planned wall lengths) and joints arise in the otherwise usual range of 1 cm (or more), then with large format stones a mortar joint of the head joints would also be advisable.
With (also considering the dimensions) proper manufacturing of walls from large format stones, the division into mortared bed joints and dry head joints is technically correct, without the materials used being generally discredited in terms of noise protection.
Within the planned scope, these dry joints / air gaps are correct and should not be filled with mortar. Foam certainly does not belong there either – even though there apparently are contemporaries who still spray several tubes of foam and silicone at the most flawless houses. Masonry, however, is not fine mechanics! – accordingly, inaccuracies in the whole millimeter range are completely acceptable here, no defect and no reason for concern.