Alex85
2016-08-09 15:23:56
- #1
I read a lot in this forum, most of the time the situation is exactly the other way around. The client has agreed on something that was not adhered to and is asking for advice here. In 99% of cases, the question comes up: "Is it documented in writing?... if not, then you probably have to accept it as it is.."
Here the architect has verbally communicated something and the written side says something else... but there is still a valid contract presented...?
In both cases, there is a valid contract.
Proving this, however, is the problem when one of the two suddenly suffers from memory loss (or simply lies).
In the first case, the problem lies with the questioner / client.
In the second case, the problem lies with the architect.