Request for advice

  • Erstellt am 2016-08-08 13:27:56

Alex85

2016-08-09 15:23:56
  • #1


In both cases, there is a valid contract.
Proving this, however, is the problem when one of the two suddenly suffers from memory loss (or simply lies).
In the first case, the problem lies with the questioner / client.
In the second case, the problem lies with the architect.
 

Basti2709

2016-08-09 15:31:34
  • #2


If I read the previous answers, apparently not in this case...
 

Alex85

2016-08-09 15:34:09
  • #3


because here both the architect and the client believe that there was a verbal agreement. First of all, good for the architect.
 

oggear51

2016-08-10 06:38:06
  • #4
Yes, but as I said, I assumed that the heating engineers would do it for the same or a similar price and not for three times the amount.
 

Basti2709

2016-08-10 07:45:40
  • #5
As mentioned, you have the written tender where there was a service from the screed layer... and a written tender from the heating installer, where it was not included... now the architect simply changed it verbally without informing you about the huge costs... and now you are supposed to pay for it... I would be pissed off too.

Of course, one should basically try to reach an amicable agreement. But since the architect immediately comes with "then sue me," I would ask him where you accepted the change. You have no knowledge that it was changed... period.

They do such work every day and constantly try to rip off clients (who are almost always laypeople). After my house construction, I am just as disappointed with German craftsmanship... the only thing they are really good at: excuses...
 

oggear51

2016-08-10 07:55:42
  • #6
Called the heating engineer on the same day and told him from the start that I am not willing to pay three times the amount, offered him €2500 which would still be €1000 more than the screed layer, he declined, then I told him to clarify it with the architect, now I am waiting, something has to come eventually and if it is a reminder, I will go to the lawyer.
 

Similar topics
23.10.2008We need an architect - or should I do it myself?14
02.01.2009Experiences with architects15
19.03.2013Turnkey or build with architects?19
21.07.2013Cost estimates from two architects differ greatly!10
13.11.2013Do you absolutely need an architect?10
16.12.2013Pre-planning with the architect - is having your own floor plan sensible?18
30.01.2014Architect's cost estimation15
21.08.2014Construction costs when building with architects. What does your experience say?18
11.02.2015Cost planning for a single-family house including land, additional costs, architect32
19.12.2014Finding architects - but how?26
08.09.2015Massive house by the architect, approximate costs?16
23.09.2015Responsibilities of the Architect in Tendering18
29.10.2015Is it normal for the purchase of land to be tied to an architect?16
19.01.2016Construction project with architects31
20.08.2016Should the house be planned by a general contractor or architects?30
10.03.2017Payment of the architect16
12.10.2017Cost of enclosed space. First draft discussed with architects27
27.10.2017Construction description by architects: Who has experience?13
07.02.2018Architect's suggestions disappointing - What next?32
16.02.2018Stress with the architect - naively signed the preliminary contract17

Oben