Property in the countryside - which property which building type - BW

or you just provide the keywords for self-Googling.

v2 boxberg de Schweigern Dell Epplinger Weg, there are two documents as PDFs: the plan and the textual determinations.

But that is the old plan. The new development area is missing.

Are there photos? If I see it correctly, there are already steep slopes on property 39. Height difference is about 4m???

slight slope

The quantification "slight" is highly subjective. For me, as a resident of the Lower Rhine lowlands, it is a medium to steep slope. The engineer in me demands numbers: [ATTACH alt="Lageplan.png" type="full"]63573[/ATTACH] The elevation data urgently need to be condensed, especially because of the unmeasured embankment recorded in the development plan. Also, the construction heights of the road must be determined as a priority.

We have now ended up with a gable roof

Do you have any idea whether the whole thing could, for example, be realized with a flat roof

Do you not care about the roof shape, or do you prefer the cubic form (commonly called Bauhaus style) and only ended up with a gable roof because you have no idea how to implement a flat roof? The significance of the eaves height for the recessed floor is legally disputed. Unfortunately, your city planners remain largely silent on this matter. Even the justification is more than sparse: In order to prevent a full floor from arising from an attic floor above, eaves and ridge heights were standardized. However, since no design reasons are given, a comparison with the effect of a gable roof should be possible, so that the eaves height may well be assumed as the top of the ground floor and the ridge height as the top of the recessed floor. The building permit authorities apparently already have a clearer view on this. In the adjacent construction phase, to which the design regulations of your development plan explicitly refer, there are already some flat-roof houses, despite approximately equivalent eaves and ridge height restrictions and even contrary permissible roof types. ’s suggestion with a recessed floor is therefore within the realm of possibility.

Building window, building line and boundary: no specifications – only those from the building code

On the contrary. There is a building boundary 2.5 m parallel to the street boundary.

Total budget without building plot: approx. €450,000

Seems a bit tight to me now, but others can certainly say more about that.

Total budget without building plot: approx. €450,000 (and yes, we are willing to do own work)

Which ones? Flooring and painting?

Seems a bit tight to me now, but others can surely say more about that.

Me too!

Style, roof shape, building type: Basement with living space (approx. 50%)
Basement, floors: Basement + full floor + attic

A basement is a must because of the slope.
A staggered floor like Bauhaus edition I find too expensive.

Living area approx. 150+ square meters (with at least 3 children's rooms)

You need a tightly planned room concept…

we would definitely build a basement (initially not livable, maybe later 1-2 rooms with sunlight due to slight slope)

… for example, there are no children yet. Therefore, a solid compact gable roof house with a basement, with two finished living/sleeping rooms in the basement for office and child, so that it does not count as a full floor.
Attic then expandable, so that more children's rooms can be created there later.

Assume €2,500 per sqm of living space. Since I assume that €450,000 also has to cover ancillary construction costs, €400,000 remain for the house, i.e. 160 sqm including basement.
80 sqm living area on the ground floor, underneath 25 sqm of utility space, 40 sqm for 2 rooms and guest bathroom, and a "cheated" half area for the office.
Attic therefore not developed for the time being, but prepared.

Which ones? Floor coverings and painting work?

Basically whatever is possible - of course it must bring a corresponding benefit - we would definitely do all the earthworks ourselves (possibly electrical work, heating, etc...).

We were on site again over the weekend and spoke with already approved builders - here a eaves height of 4 meters was permitted, which is why we now assume (but I will definitely ask again) that we can build similarly.

Thank you very much for the suggestion
"Set 2500€ per sqm of living space. Since I assume that 450,000€ must also cover the incidental building costs, 400,000€ remain for the house, i.e. 160 sqm including basement.
80 sqm living space on the ground floor, below that 25 sqm utility space, 40 sqm for 2 rooms and guest bathroom, and a fudged “half area” for an office.
So the attic is not developed for the time being, but prepared."

What I don’t understand - what does an undeveloped attic look like? Without cladding or what do you mean?

Today we also visited a house park and became aware of various manufacturers. At first glance (also from the consultation) I liked a-z Hausbau best - but earlier while googling I became a bit suspicious because the website looked a bit strange and the managing director is apparently involved in several companies... does anyone here have experience with this?

Basically, we have now landed on a gable roof - also thanks to your assessments and help!!!

What we are still interested in here is the question whether the gable roof can be installed in both directions (so basically "upside down")?

In any case, a big thanks already for all your messages!!

What we would still be interested in here is the question whether the gable roof can be installed in both directions (so to speak "the wrong way round")?

Do you mean with the gables on the long sides? - that would be rather counterproductive to gain usable space.