Prefabricated house or solid house

We decided on prefabricated construction. Our currently favored offer amounts to 2160 euros per sqm. It is a two-story house with a 30° hipped roof, two bathrooms with walk-in showers, gas condensing boiler with underfloor heating, preparation for a fireplace in the living room, preparation for photovoltaics, Q2 plastering work, wallpapering, floor coverings, base plate. Handover in 8 months after "fulfillment of delivery conditions," which includes the building permit. Our offer is currently being reviewed by a specialist; I will probably receive feedback today and can then get back to you. In the above list, I only mentioned part of it so I don't have to type out the entire offer. On this occasion, the idea of a new thread came to me with the question of whether it is allowed to post complete offers here in anonymized form.

Thanks. Finally a clear answer. Did you also get an offer from Danwood? They should be even better in terms of price/performance ratio.

You will be surprised, but there are no consistently noticeable differences in price or construction time between solid construction and prefabricated construction. With both variants, you can build a good and also affordable house.

Where are the providers with their square meter prices? (without basement, with slab)

Prices start under €2000. However, you absolutely must see what is included and, even more importantly, what is missing. There is no really good comparability. Afterwards, you can calculate it, and you will find some information about it here in the forum. Recently, there was a survey about this.

DanWood is said to be the cheapest here, but is that really the case and how big is the difference?

This statement is untenable. There are a number of affordable providers – take a walk through a model home exhibition and you will have a selection. The differences lie in countless details ranging from the choice of building materials to the technical equipment, floors, walls, bathroom fittings... . Furthermore, there are organizational differences such as building with your own people, subcontractors, local craftsmen... .

Who currently has experience here and can share it with us?

We moved into our new house in August. It was built using prefabricated construction by a local carpentry company. My wife and I are wood enthusiasts and value as consistently natural materials as possible. This makes quite a bit more expensive even though you don’t see it (for example, insulation). Furthermore, it was important for us to work with regional companies.
With that, we wanted to ensure good communication (crucial for stress-free building), higher quality (they have a reputation locally), and easier correction of errors (which always happen in construction). Behind these aspects, the price per square meter took a back seat – I never really determined it either.
If I had gone with a prefabricated house manufacturer, I would probably have chosen a regional one as well.

What speaks in favor of kfw40+? Is it worth it or rather not?

This question is then contested by the second half of the forum

Very briefly: for "true believers" (green tech freaks) and/or those who value a good feeling more than their wallet—then yes. Or if the construction company only builds to KfW40 anyway (as many timber frame builders do), you go along with it. Otherwise, "real" KFW-55 or KfW-55 but somewhat better insulated.

They should be even better in terms of price/performance ratio

Building a house is a business, with the associated profit-making intention. No house manufacturer / construction company primarily pursues the non-profit goal of pushing the homeownership rate with the most socially acceptable square meter prices. The cheap providers all cheat in their construction service descriptions (by omissions, or by using legally / emotionally differently charged terms like "turnkey," etc.), and you will never find out who the most affordable providers are in a clear form, due to a simple structural flaw: regional providers are regularly overlooked by comparison portals and magazines because from their point of view "regionality" is contrary to "relevance." How well you are advised as a builder by Jupp Schmitz or Xaver Huber can only be found out about a half-hour drive around their company headquarters – but that then live and real from people whose likes are not fakes. Unfortunately, it is no guarantee to draw conclusions about good work from deep neglect in marketing and web design, but it is very often a serious indication.

...
Did you also get an offer from Danwood?
...

No, we did not. But that would certainly have been an option for us as well.