Poroton bricks damaged in foundation wall

  • Erstellt am 2019-10-14 23:27:21

Zaba12

2019-10-15 12:33:58
  • #1
If the OP asks the same question again after this detailed explanation, there would be no helping him anymore.

Nice explanation *Top*
 

HilfeHilfe

2019-10-15 13:17:58
  • #2
Looking forward to the next trade. They are typical Green voters who think they have saved the climate by paying the CO2 emissions tax.
 

Silent010

2019-10-15 14:28:53
  • #3
From my point of view, it depends on the profession you come from. In many professions, there is right or wrong, 1 or 0. In construction, especially in shell construction, there is still a lot in between...
 

Bookstar

2019-10-15 15:37:56
  • #4
Green voters should be legally prohibited from building houses because it is the biggest climate sin after [Karibikkreuzfahrt]...
 

11ant

2019-10-15 15:38:10
  • #5
I am utterly delighted by the naked photos of such perfect walls. In 26 months here – and from my approximately 8170 written posts you can gladly estimate how many posts from others I have read – I can count on one hand how rarely I have seen such exemplary walls: there are fewer minimal chip-offs on the edges than on any roll of double cookies, the overlap dimension is correctly maintained, only in very few places is there any mortar in the butt joints at all, so no sloppy pockets. That one stone is a bit more orange and another more pink is not a defect. If one were to leave it like that as exposed masonry, it would be a reference for the bricklayer, and a painter can easily fix the hairline cracks. Gotthilf Penibel would compose odes of praise. The OP seems to me, free paraphrasing , to be a micrometer-guy and will need strong nerves for all further trades: they won’t come together that well again when they’re this young. This bricklayer should be called back for the facing bricks. Young, jiv´ mer ens dem sing Adreß
 

Similar topics
07.04.2020Interior walls: masonry or drywall?17
22.07.2020Grill corner walls height difference24

Oben