Plot in flood protection area - Not recommended?

Ouch, without a basement and without a roof. Apart from the pure plot size (does the slope count towards the floor area ratio calculation basis?), this reads to me, all in all, as keep looking.

Oh, why not? Storage rooms can also be built very nicely on the ground floor.

@TE you can make life or building difficult for yourself. How do you get the idea to want to build in a flood zone when your first question is about the costs???

However, the municipalities also do not learn from the misdevelopment of the past decades... I cannot understand how the responsible [Naturschutzbehörde], the disaster control, and the land-use planning can even designate development plans in the flood zone.

Look at Deggendorf, there probably wasn't anyone who thought it would ever flood, and it doesn't matter at all whether the flood only happens once every 100 years, when it comes, you are ruined...

@OP you can make life or building itself difficult. How do you come up with the idea of wanting to build in a flood zone when your first question is about the costs???

Sorry, but that is pure cynicism.
How does he come up with the idea? Probably there simply are no alternatives at the moment.
Do you think there is always, everywhere, the perfect plot of land for everyone? And also at any price?

but the municipalities also don’t learn from the misdevelopment of the past decades... how the responsible nature conservation authority, disaster control and land-use planning can even designate development plans in flood zones is beyond me.

Look at Deggendorf, nobody probably thought it would ever get flooded and it doesn’t matter at all whether the flood only comes once every 100 years, if it comes then you’re ruined...

That completely misses the reality of life.
People have been building on rivers for thousands of years, they build on Vesuvius, above coal mines and elsewhere.
If you didn’t build anywhere anymore where there is a likelihood that every 100-200 years the hut goes down the drain or otherwise falls victim to nature, half of the building stock wouldn’t exist at all.
The probability indeed makes a big difference. In Passau on the Danube the basement is underwater every 2 years, in the TE’s building area maybe only in the next but one millennium. And therefore he’s not supposed to build there today?
The HQExtreme area also means that you are at the edge of a possible flood. That means you just have some water in the basement, not 3 meters of mud flood up to the first floor.
That is certainly not great, but it also doesn’t mean that the whole house collapses because of it.

Just for comparison: At HQExtrem, 2/3 of the entire city areas are affected in our 60T city in BY.

Sorry, but this is pure cynicism. How does he come up with that idea? Probably there simply are no alternatives at the moment. Do you think there is always, everywhere the perfect plot of land for everyone? And that too for any price?

That completely misses reality. People have been building by rivers for thousands of years, they build on Vesuvius, over coal mines, and elsewhere. If no one were allowed to build anywhere where there is a chance that the house might be wiped out by a flood or otherwise fall victim to nature every 100-200 years, then half of the existing buildings wouldn’t exist at all. Probability makes a very big difference. In Passau on the Danube, the basement is flooded every 2 years; in the TE’s building area maybe only in the next millennium. And because of that he shouldn’t build there today? HQExtreme also means that you are on the edge of a possible flood. That means you just have some water in the basement, not 3 meters of mud flood up to the first floor. That’s certainly not great, but it’s also not like the whole house collapses because of it.

Thank you apokolok, you literally speak from my heart. It is exactly so that we a) did not, like some by chance, acquire a plot through inheritance and b) do not live in Hintertuxingen where the selection, the supply, and the price are still reasonable. If you seriously want to build, you have to check every reasonably sensible offer. That has nothing to do with making things “harder on oneself.”

Above all, this is not planning on a greenfield site. Rather, it is a converted area between existing buildings and above all it is already adjusted in height so that it should be uncritical. Above all, we are not talking about a flood zone where such projects are of course not permitted, but rather a protection area that can possibly be flooded if protection facilities fail.