We are aware that this is a total matter of taste, but just hope for a little input from you.
Basically, I think it is good to plan elements in the house so that they form an aesthetic whole. Relating the question to roof tiles and window frames is like asking someone about the combination of belt and shoes without showing the rest of the clothing.
Show the design. By the way, this used to be common practice here in the forum and did no harm to anyone.
What I basically don't like is "fake," meaning when a material visually pretends to be another (keyword plastic windows with wood decor).
Regarding window quality: I assume that you can get good and durable solutions for all mentioned window variants and that there are craftsmen and architects who know how to use them properly. When calculating with a "sharp pencil," only plastic is an option. As soon as wood is involved, saving at the wrong end can really go badly wrong. Even admitted or self-honest "maintenance slackers" have good reasons to stay away from wood.
I am not a fan of roofs without eaves at all - primarily the facade suffers underneath - it looks very worn after just a few years on the north side. Especially with the hotter summers and increasingly heavy rain showers, on the contrary, I am in favor of as large eaves as possible.
I grew up in a house without eaves and with internal gutters. The upper floor was paneled with slate imitation made of Eternit. The facade suffered zero damage and did not look bad even after 40 years. Visually, it was already very nice. The repairs of the downpipe connections later cost a lot of money. Nevertheless, I built myself with 60 cm eaves. The architect ideally adapted the eaves to the location of the house, and I can confirm the advantages you mentioned regarding sun and heavy rain.