Newly built bungalow. Floor plan evaluation

We currently have 3 bathrooms, that is too many for us. One of the reasons we are building is also to downsize.

I can relate to that very well! If I had to save square meters, a second toilet would also go. Many people here don’t understand that.

We considered the window in the dressing room, but due to the ventilation system, it is not necessary.

Light! Having to switch on the light every time is not nice. A window doesn’t cost much. It can be a higher placed or a frosted window.

Slope approx. 1.5m from the street

Are you sure? Is there a current elevation plan? According to the development plan and canal planning, it looks like only 50cm, with a 2m slope over the entire length of the property.

Number of floors: no information

Yes. Two stories. Since it is not mandatory, of course, it might not matter to you.

cannot have a continuous side wall due to boundary construction

Are you sure that wall openings help? As far as I know, carports are assigned a fictitious wall.

max. 1 m may be filled up

Textual part of the development plan:
3.3 Terrain alterations
Fillings and excavations on the building plots are permitted up to a max. total height of 1.5 m compared to the natural terrain
How much filling is planned?

tendentially 4-5 m away from the curb

With my elevation interpretation from the development plan it would work, with 1.5m slope it would not.
4m * 15% = 0.6m maximum height difference
or the other way around
1.5m / 5m = 0.3 = 30% > maximum permitted gradient of 15%

Are you sure? Is there a current height plan? According to the development plan and canal planning, it looks like only 50cm, a 2m slope over the entire length of the property.

Yes. Two-storey. Since it is not mandatory, of course you don't have to care.

Are you sure that wall openings help? I know it so that carports are assigned a fictitious wall.

Textual part of the development plan:
3.3 Terrain changes
Fillings and excavations on the building plots are permitted up to a maximum total height of 1.5 m compared to the natural terrain
How much filling is planned?

With my height interpretation of the development plan it would work, with 1.5m embankment not.
4m * 15% = 0.6m maximum height difference
or the other way around
1.5m / 5m = 0.3 = 30% > maximum allowable gradient of 15%

What happens if in some places it is more, e.g. 20%, and on average again 15% after paving?

What happens if in some places it is more. For example 20% and on average 15% again after paving

The legally prescribed 15% for medium and large garages do not apply to small garages. Nevertheless, they should not be exceeded according to the recognized rules of technology. It is also in one’s own interest not to slip away or get stuck on black ice. 20% is still considered suitable for practical use, even if you then have to pay close attention to the transitions, as some production vehicles threaten to scrape. §3 Garage Regulation (2) 1Between public traffic areas and a ramp with more than 10 percent incline, there must be an area at least 3 m long whose incline may not exceed 10 percent. 2Exceptions may be granted for ramps of small garages if there are no concerns regarding safety or traffic order. If the exception is not granted, the carport must be moved further back. And further back means further down.

Thank you Cars are not parked on. Only the entrance to the house must be wheelchair accessible and for that a part of the yard has to be raised Parents and parents-in-law have over 30% This is not unusual here That is why I was surprised