MarkFalk
2024-02-27 18:39:37
- #1
Hello, in our house built in 1992 there are plastic windows, the U-value is given as 2.8 in the documents. Since I am still hesitant about a facade insulation (including new windows) due to the costs, which will not pay off even if I were to exceed 100, the idea of replacing the panes as a cost-effective DIY measure comes to mind. The window frames as well as the sashes including seals are still perfectly fine, no damage, and I have already removed the window trim on one window as a test – that works. Of course, the U-value of the old frames is worse than that of new windows, but replacing only the sashes is not possible and replacing the "simple" double-glass panes from the 90s with modern insulated double glazing roughly halves their U-value. The problem: the pane thickness is an unusual 21mm. Common modern thicknesses are 4+14+4 or (better) 4+16+4. At the same time, I have noticed that the window trim does not lie somewhat higher than the frame, as seen in all related videos about pane replacement so that they can be knocked out with a suitable tool (or wedge/block), but rather "coincidentally" (?) about 1mm lower than the frame. As mentioned, I can still remove the trim with a spatula etc., but it is clearly more fiddly than shown in the videos. Naturally, I cannot fit 24mm panes with 16mm spacing there (and I also do not know who the actual window manufacturer is to ask if they also offer thinner trims). My question is therefore whether it could be possible to install at least 22mm panes (for 21mm I would only manage with 5-12-4 or 4-12-5, but on the one hand that is more expensive and heavier than 2 x 4mm glass and on the other hand 14mm spacing insulates better) and whether these trims that lie 1mm lower than the frame are not because this is necessarily the case and corresponds to the sash construction, but only because (due to cost reasons, obviously) 21mm panes and not 22mm panes were installed. Ultimately, whether something like this was common earlier, in the 90s.