New construction Poroton T7 MW 36.5 without controlled residential ventilation

  • Erstellt am 2016-08-12 18:00:08

Bieber0815

2016-10-06 06:42:03
  • #1
You must have money .... With a heat pump, I could understand that, but the controlled residential ventilation cannot be heard three meters in front of the house anymore. And otherwise only at the air outlet. If it matters, it can also be planned better so that you practically hear nothing anymore. And inside, it can also be designed so that audible sound only occurs at the location of the central unit.
 

kkk272729

2016-10-07 12:00:24
  • #2
I also deliberately built without [Kontrollierte-Wohnraumlüftung] and support the viewpoint of Knallkörper.

The problem nowadays is, of course, that houses are built much too quickly and moving in happens far too early.

That mold forms without [Kontrollierte-Wohnraumlüftung] when living in a yogurt cup is hardly surprising. Where else should the moisture go.
 

Grym

2016-10-07 20:14:55
  • #3

That's true, if you let the house stand longer, air pockets form in the interior and exterior plaster (both top and base coat) and in the same spot right through the 36.5 cm exterior wall. The house then breathes through these air pockets. Completely correctly identified. Every time you exhale, you actually create an overpressure in the house, which makes the air whistle through the newly formed holes, and when you inhale, you pull fresh air back into the house. This is also the reason why houses smell musty when no one has been there for a while. No one has been consistently breathing in and out to make the house breathe.

And you definitely wouldn't want this firecracker as a neighbor, oh man.
 

Knallkörper

2016-10-07 20:28:15
  • #4


Did you cognitively process the post correctly? Of course, it makes sense somewhere to properly dry the building before moving in, and over winter this can be done without technical drying. It is often argued energetically "green" (which is far from my own view), but that technical drying, whether using a construction dryer or controlled residential ventilation, requires a lot of energy is often forgotten. What is also often overlooked is that a house without controlled residential ventilation obviously has to be designed very differently from a building physics standpoint. Apparently, you have also been well missioned and live with the conviction that there is only "one" way to build, with a warm roof, vapor barrier, blower door test, to name a few keywords.

So I find this sarcasm at a fourth-grade level very inappropriate.

And no, I don't wish anyone responsible for exceeding noise levels my neighborhood. That’s legitimate.
 

Legurit

2016-10-07 20:35:15
  • #5
Certainly, one can build differently... but accordingly, the heating costs are then higher, right? We spoke with some owners of timber frame eco-houses and they mentioned heating costs in the range of 100 € and more. I am happy to be proven wrong - which construction method ensures fresh air without disproportionate ventilation?
 

Grym

2016-10-07 20:54:44
  • #6

There is only one way for VOCs, formaldehyde, 99% of the humidity, CO2, etc. to get from inside to outside – through ventilation. Either you do this 5 times a day for 10 minutes each (and still have worse but acceptable air quality compared to controlled residential ventilation, cold air in winter, no fresh or freezing cold air in the bedroom in winter (and autumn and spring), etc...) or you install a controlled residential ventilation system.

Now you could say, controlled residential ventilation is too expensive for me. If you compare it to almost an hour of ventilation per day, then the time saved should be worth it to you, but whatever. Controlled residential ventilation is too expensive.

But if the quarterly filter change is really too exhausting, then maybe you should give up on the house and so on.
Not to mention, with such an attitude you will never properly ventilate the house manually...
 

Similar topics
09.09.2010Ventilation system in the new building, yes or no?39
01.03.2017Controlled residential ventilation - Yes or No?!31
29.02.2012What can be detected in a blower door test, which house values?18
26.07.2012Ventilation with controlled residential ventilation system14
10.05.2012Heating costs per year KfW55 - KfW70, building decision heating11
27.02.2013Controlled residential ventilation or regulated air - experiences?14
16.09.2014Ventilation in prefab houses (wood frame with ETICS) also in solid houses?36
10.11.2022Ventilation in the insulated attic23
12.06.2015But install a controlled residential ventilation system?54
22.09.2016Offer KfW70 house - KfW55 house already with additional controlled residential ventilation - Is KfW70 too airtight?12
25.01.2017Blower Door Test for KfW 70 according to the 2012 standard?15
14.05.2017Building drying: Is it better to turn off the controlled residential ventilation system in summer?12
08.11.2017Ventilation: central or decentralized?27
07.02.2020Blower Door Test - Meaning of the Result35
28.05.2018Air-water heat pump or gas + controlled residential ventilation in a 135 sqm single-family house?19
29.04.2018Gas heating + solar & controlled residential ventilation or air-water heat pump Energy Saving Ordinance 201626
19.12.2019Blower Door Test 1.7 with two hints22
17.02.2020Open kitchen: exhaust or recirculation in controlled residential ventilation & KfW5540
14.06.2020Ventilation in summer without controlled residential ventilation is problematic19

Oben