Hello f.a.b.,
in principle and especially from an entrepreneur’s perspective, I find your enthusiasm and commitment totally great. It always takes people who dare to take risks, otherwise nothing happens – just to say that upfront before I start complaining again. :)
Now back to the unemotional numbers and let’s play through another scenario:
Let’s assume you could sell the property within 3 months to an investor for 750K€.
Then each of you could set aside 100K€ (the maximum amount of deposit insurance in Germany for banks) as a reserve and invest 500K€ in liquid capital (plus 50K€ incidental costs! for acquisition) into an already existing or planned property. Depending on the (desired) equity ratio (33-50%!), a total investment of 1 to 1.5 million would be possible.
Advantages:
1. Your existing equity of 200K€ remains untouched (but could be included)
2. Additional free capital is created (possible investment with interest income in Australia)
3. Less time required (more own earnings in Australia)
4. Lower overall risk
5. Immediate/much earlier capital return flow if, for example, invested in an already existing/rented property
6. When investing in an existing property, all numbers are on the table at the time of purchase, including the actual rental income, i.e., you calculate with real figures.
Disadvantage:
1. It’s not your “own baby” on your own property (at this point also check your own emotional attachment to the property! If you calculate strictly, you have to be able to sell the property at the right price without batting an eye!)
2. Possibly lower (in absolute terms, not percentage-wise) overall return (but also less risk/capital deployment!)
Regarding equity:
my property valuation was rather conservative, the standard land value is 96EUR / m2 so with 7000m2 672K€, and I was also thinking more of 15 apartments rather than 20, so then the construction costs would be 2,250K€ with equity of 872K€ and that would be 38% equity. So I think I can manage the equity, if not I’ll build less / smaller.
Just a note on that. An investor will squeeze the property down to the last centimeter, only in this way can you achieve a market-appropriate return. The idea that one could build less and thereby generate more return or avoid risk, I fundamentally consider wrong. A large garden will presumably not be paid for by a tenant, but the capital input in the form of building land is the same, unless you first build 15 apartments and leave 1/4 of the land free for later development. Another option would be to differentiate yourself from the local standard and sell generous garden areas as a plus – but there must also be a corresponding demand (with upscale equipment, possibly age-appropriate).
In short, I don’t want to dissuade you, but I believe you have very good alternatives and for various reasons cannot do without an external investor.
Best regards!
Dirk Grafe
P.S.: When investing 1.5 million, about 150K€ incidental costs occur; above only 50K€ are assumed...