The approach of planning such minimal distances would lead to a house where one would experience "optimal" closeness. Doors slammed into corners always reduce the perception of space even more than they reduce the actual floor space. Do you really want to create a house as an experience of discomfort (due to claustrophobia in every corner)?
In some places, however, it sometimes cannot be helped (without having to make other compromises). I know this from our plan as well. A corridor as small as possible leads to narrow distances between two adjacent doors. Objectively, one has to decide between
a) close wall distance of the doors, but generous door widths,
b) generous wall distance of the doors, but smaller door widths,
c) enlargement of the corridor at the expense of living space in 3 other rooms.
We ended up with a). Therefore, I find the question quite interesting whether there are "normal" standard minimum distances in the raw construction dimension across different manufacturers.