Papierturm
2025-08-27 11:19:19
- #1
Thanks, :) yes, we have already considered the points you mentioned. But can't contractual agreements be made beforehand with the shell construction company and window installer to ensure corrections if, for example, problems arise during the blower-door test? The general contractors will also somehow secure themselves with the companies involved.
The problem is called "diffusion of responsibility."
With a general contractor (GC), the responsibility lies with the GC, and no matter what and where something went wrong, the GC has to fix it. And if it is contractually agreed, for example, that the house is built to KFW40 standards, then the work ("contract for work and services") remains defective until this is achieved.
If trades each work with their own responsibility somewhere along the line, they can pass the responsibility to each other. This is usually not that significant because the trades are partly independent of each other (for example, if the staircase does not fit, the electrician has nothing to do with it). Precisely with KFW40, this does not apply: if the goal is narrowly missed, it can happen that the trades shift the responsibility to each other.
For example, if the target is narrowly not reached, is it due to the facade? The airtightness? The installed insulation? The windows? The planning (window areas also play a role)? Fundamental decisions (e.g., building without controlled residential ventilation => significantly harder to achieve KFW 40)?
If there are problems that cannot be clearly assigned, this diffusion of responsibility is dangerous.
Especially with the KFW300, a lot of money is at stake due to the interest advantage.
It is possible, but the security here is lower due to the diffusion of responsibility.