Lowering the KfW level - impact on loan amount?

  • Erstellt am 2024-03-28 20:22:47

Obereiche

2024-03-28 20:22:47
  • #1
Hello dear community,

I have been pondering for a few days about a problem with our KfW funding that I would like to bring to you:

We originally started our house renovation with the intention of submitting individual applications through Bafa, which has already been done for the geothermal drilling. However, before the actual start of construction, interest rates skyrocketed, so we decided to opt for KfW-55 funding instead. At that time, our energy consultant advised us to choose the EE supplement and drop the Bafa application. Although the geothermal drilling would then no longer be retroactively eligible for funding, the higher subsidy amount and the higher loan amount from the EE supplement would compensate for that. The only downside was that since 2023, a ventilation system with heat recovery is mandatory in all EE levels, and we actually do not want a ventilation system (my wife works in filter manufacturing and can only confirm all the disadvantages circulating on the internet). We then asked the energy consultant what such a system would cost, and he told us we should expect around 10,000 euros. After a brief rough calculation, we decided that the EE program was still worthwhile and decided to only use the ventilation system when needed. So we finally applied for the KfW-55 EE (the Bafa application has not yet been withdrawn, but that's not urgent as long as we don't apply for disbursement), received the funding grant, and started. Now that we have reached the point where the ventilation system should be installed, we had to find after comparing several offers that it will rather cost around 20,000 euros. Spending that much money on something we do not even want makes us think, and moreover, our cost-benefit calculation now looks quite different. The question arises whether we should forgo the EE level after all and have the heating (including geothermal drilling) funded through Bafa as originally planned.

I have already informed myself: a downgrade to a lower KfW level is possible even after the start of the measures. What I am wondering, however, is how this affects the approved funding sum, as we would then have a lower entitlement.

And one more question: According to the energy consultant, the ventilation system is necessary anyway because otherwise, we would have to deal with mold problems. However, we have two acquaintances who built a KfW-55 house without EE and also without a ventilation system and still have no problems.
 

ypg

2024-03-28 21:07:53
  • #2
Well, you need a ventilation concept, and ventilating is comfortable and energy-saving with a ventilation system. How do they ventilate then? Manually? Ventilating three times a day means hard work and half an hour of effort every day. In winter, that means letting energy out through the windows. That’s why KfW houses require the ventilation system. What would those be? Is it the case that if you work in manufacturing, you know what it does to you? I’m just looking for a comparison. If your wife worked at Berentzen or Holsten, would she then know what my liver looks like? I can’t imagine that! Anyway: to your question. I don’t know exactly. But I’ve heard that you simply don’t get anything if you haven’t achieved what you applied for.
 

Obereiche

2024-03-28 21:47:41
  • #3


Thank you anyway for your effort!
 

ypg

2024-03-28 22:09:23
  • #4

It would be nice if you could answer my questions :) Maybe then you will see things more clearly…
 

Obereiche

2024-03-28 22:21:06
  • #5
With regard to your questions, I already have a clear view. Therefore, I did not ask those but rather the ones in the topic of this thread, from which I would prefer not to digress. Maybe someone else is familiar with the funding modalities.
 

ypg

2024-03-28 22:35:08
  • #6

But you do realize that here in the forum, both questions and answers are allowed equally, regardless of which user, so that a lively exchange ultimately leads to the answer?

And if you apparently know more, and someone asks you about it, then you should also have the decency to explain it.

Again: I and certainly many others here would like to know which prejudices exist regarding the ventilation system or which of them are true, as far as filter manufacturers or their employees can assess.
 

Similar topics
15.06.2016Bafa: Renewable Energy Heat Pumps with Test Certification32
23.09.2017Bafa innovation funding for heat pump possibly too late - what now?15
15.02.2020KFW55 funding + BAFA funding57
20.01.2020New BAFA funding - Air-to-water heat pump with solar thermal39
09.02.2020BAFA - Funding: House contract before application submission?10
27.03.2020When does BAFA pay out the funding (air-water heat pump in new construction)?10
03.06.2020KfW 55 + BAFA Funding - Costs and Subsidies24
24.05.2020Heat pump and BAFA - What is true and what is not?24
13.09.2020BAFA funding for heat pump (air-to-water heat pump) when building with a developer25
14.02.2024Bafa funding for heat pumps will be discontinued as of 31.12.2020.510
20.04.2021BAFA funding depends on the form "Confirmation of the Developer"20
09.09.2021KFW 55 EE Funding - New Construction Brick Thickness/Ventilation System?25
17.08.2021House costs per KFW level per m²32
12.11.2021Exclusion of funding / Purchase contract signed before KFW grant10
06.02.2022New Construction KfW 55 EE: Different opinions between energy consultant and general contractor27
07.05.2022KfW stop! Energy consultant wants his money!61
01.08.2023BAFA Funding - What Waiting Time Is Realistic?27
25.04.2023Which type of funding should I choose? KfW, BAFA, tax?21
30.06.2023Cancellation of an already confirmed Bafa funding15
03.09.2024New funding rates BAFA 2024 - also KfW?15

Oben