ypg
2025-10-06 21:33:20
- #1
who says it is terrible?Thank you for the example of complete detachment. You have practically reached the Neptune of demands. What is so terrible about this wardrobe?
who says it is terrible?Thank you for the example of complete detachment. You have practically reached the Neptune of demands. What is so terrible about this wardrobe?
Everyone sees that from their own perspective. You seem to like it.What is so terrible about this wardrobe?
"Dusty" is still a very mild way to put it.Unfortunately, one also has to mention the dusty external views here. Nice appearance doesn't have to cost more.
Can you be a bit more specific?
This wardrobe is catastrophic and clearly unworthy of a private home. Of course, one can also aim for a private home simply as a measure against the fear of rent increases or owner’s termination notices; but a little improvement of the current living conditions "does no harm" either. The depicted situation might be considered still tolerable for a rental apartment – but seeing it as a motivation for improvement is not exaggerated in my opinion. It is obviously not enough for the residents, and even a single guest with his hat or umbrella would make the situation overflow and would have to keep his jacket on ;-)What is so terrible about this wardrobe?
That is why I also recommended choosing the "plain regular two-family house" model (with apartment doors temporarily omitted and only a pre-equipped kitchen in the second apartment). Maybe one of the bathrooms with a shower and the other with a bathtub, and the economy satisfaction of the need is done. 08/15A to 08/15Z are numerous variants, all noticeably cheaper than 7016 or even 4711.Not everyone planning 4 children is swimming in money. There are also families with 4 children and normal incomes.