Bauexperte
2014-04-01 10:10:23
- #1
Hello,
From my experience, legal disputes regarding the amount of damage probably incurred over 5 years are not really "worth it." As the Rhinelander says: "You throw good money after bad." You write further below that there is still a need for clarification with your former landlord; how about involving a mediator? In the end, that is cheaper for both sides and has the same effect of having a neutral person involved.
Rhineland regards
As far as I remember from my tenant days, fulfillment of a claim also includes its recognition, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise. If a claim is recognized, corrections are excluded. That would mean that you can only challenge the last utility bill.Actually, he has the mindset to just let it go 5 degrees, give the landlord a statement accordingly, and that's it. But unfortunately, the landlord no longer adheres to verbal agreements either, and now he is considering what legal options he has. An official acceptance is to take place in the next few days with a billing company. He is now considering having this grievance included in the acceptance protocol so that there is already evidence. (It could be demonstrated by means of safeguarding). Would that already be a proper procedure to possibly secure claims? Also, what could he achieve? In other words, could he claim the costs for all those years? Even if he has already accepted the utility bills from previous years?
That is difficult and also dangerous to answer. If your landlord knew about this practice and deliberately concealed it from you, "I" would want to call it intentional deception. Only - as everywhere else, you bear the burden of proof.How would it be in this hypothetical case? Would that even be fraud? Or electricity theft? Or just a billing error?
From my experience, legal disputes regarding the amount of damage probably incurred over 5 years are not really "worth it." As the Rhinelander says: "You throw good money after bad." You write further below that there is still a need for clarification with your former landlord; how about involving a mediator? In the end, that is cheaper for both sides and has the same effect of having a neutral person involved.
Rhineland regards