Land purchase - converting land into building land

  • Erstellt am 2017-06-03 12:55:24

Nordlys

2017-06-08 08:37:31
  • #1
I have read and understood your link. Stupid. Knalli, read this carefully. Karsten
 

77.willo

2017-06-08 18:10:53
  • #2
This insight would have been possible more easily as well - but it's good that it is now becoming apparent.
 

Nordlys

2017-06-08 21:29:02
  • #3
To Musketier. Could it be that this is not applied uniformly nationwide? Example one. We private. Property purchased in 2016 for amount xy. The notary contract mentioned an expansion contribution for the water supplier and a price for the already installed shafts, which together made up the total. Property transfer tax was only calculated on the base price. Another example professionally. Sale of former grassland as commercial land for price x. To a company. A zoning plan change had been initiated. A clause in the contract stated that if the zoning plan ultimately designated the land as residential building land instead of commercial land, amount y was to be paid additionally. This happened after three years. To my knowledge, there was no additional property transfer tax payment. Karsten
 

Musketier

2017-06-09 09:13:11
  • #4
For your first part, I have also heard here in the forum that separately stated connection costs would not be subject to real estate transfer tax. In our case, it was also stated separately, but we paid real estate transfer tax on the full amount. I researched this about 4 years ago, but did not find anything to the contrary. However, maybe there has been some ruling or an administrative instruction on this in the meantime.

Regarding the second part, I would say you were lucky or the notary was not informed at the time of the second due date. To my knowledge, the notary passes the information on to the tax office. To what extent the company would also have had an obligation to inform the tax office about the change in the assessment basis, I am not sure. However, this does not change the fact that, in my opinion, the full amount would have been taxable.
 

Nordlys

2017-06-09 09:26:50
  • #5
Regarding 2): n. was not informed. Only correspondence with the buyer that, based on the contract from such and such, an additional payment is due. Karsten
 

tempic

2017-06-09 10:35:38
  • #6
How is the tax office supposed to know that the assessment basis has changed? It is still tax fraud though ...

Regarding 1.) Development costs do not belong to the assessment basis of the real estate transfer tax when buying an undeveloped plot of land
 

Similar topics
28.12.2011Objection to real estate transfer tax15
04.10.2012Real estate transfer tax10
01.12.2014Real estate transfer tax / what is the tax applied to? Which developer MUST?30
09.01.2018Trends in property acquisition tax24
02.11.2014Increase in property transfer tax in NRW19
03.11.2014Real estate transfer tax, who is familiar with it?16
26.12.2014No disbursement of funding - Tax office is slow44
05.02.2015Is it possible for the partner to contribute to the real estate transfer tax?11
14.12.2017Property acquisition tax notice for land same contract document21
03.06.2015How are the notary fees and real estate transfer tax calculated?26
06.12.2016Contract for work before property purchase - real estate acquisition tax?10
21.01.2016Paying out partner and second time real estate transfer tax28
04.07.2016Purchase of property under a work contract12
24.03.2017Property acquisition tax - Was everything calculated correctly?16
12.06.2017The tax office wants to know how we are financing our construction project50
29.11.2017Timeline of real estate acquisition tax and house construction contract20
26.07.2018Additional financing for real estate transfer tax47
24.02.2019Property acquisition tax on a house not yet built - yes/no?13
30.01.2020Tax office questionnaire for the assessment of real estate transfer tax11
16.02.20254 years after construction, the office also demands land acquisition tax on the house96

Oben