Land planning for a triangular plot

So I thought as much. So it will be pitch dark in the kitchen. I would be very angry about that and far from "coping" with it. But for the little son... well, that's different. Normally, the old house would have to be replanned and rebuilt, and that would be on your tab.

That reduces the market value of the property, so the buyout amount for the brother is lower. ;)

I wish you much success. Please keep us informed.

The reason for rejection is the issue of the outer area and the unwanted exemplary effect for the remaining areas along the street.

It is difficult to find arguments against this. Do you have any?

The areas behind are all privately owned. The part on the border west of the projected area belongs to my aunt. The other, much larger part belongs to a neighbor. He also wants to create a building plot there for his son (for a single-family house), my aunt has no interest in building there (>80 years old). The current discussion revolves around a rounding statute or easements and/or building encumbrances in favor of the city, which stipulates that the northern part of the street may only be built up to the boundary of the development on the southern side of the street and, of course, also directly to what extent. That would correspond to a maximum of 2 more houses.

We find it difficult to find arguments against it. Do you have any?

I would argue with the 3-Span figure. Otherwise, §34 hardly allows the construction project, since the house is the last one on the street side before the open area. Is there a land use plan indicating the open area on the property?

Is there a land use plan from which the outside area on the property can be derived?

Property? There is a land use plan; it was newly rolled out two years ago. The entire area is designated as residential building land. However, no legal claim to development can be derived from the mere existence of the land use plan.