Kfw 40 Plus funding - Ban on feed-in tariff?

  • Erstellt am 2021-08-13 20:43:20

berny

2021-08-26 10:42:24
  • #1
Yeah, sure, but then it won’t take long until battery power is cheaper than the one from the grid.
 

rdwlnts

2021-08-26 10:43:18
  • #2
That is the goal. It doesn't work yet.
 

Markus254

2021-08-26 11:35:55
  • #3
Currently, the feed-in tariff is 7.4 cents/kWh (decreasing by 0.1 cent per month). At some point, it will no longer be profitable. An alternative would be the [Strom Cloud] model. The fed-in electricity is "stored" and "retrieved" again when needed ... However, it apparently is still not really worthwhile, since the electricity price is higher than the grid electricity and you pay a monthly fee. You would really have to calculate in which scenario it makes sense.
 

Fuchur

2021-08-26 14:34:37
  • #4

You can't just state it so generally. Because this is a calculation with many unknowns, which are then simply estimated wildly. It starts with the battery lifespan and continues with the annual cycles, not to mention the price of the underlying battery pack and possibly subsidies.
 

rdwlnts

2021-08-26 14:38:25
  • #5
That is why the specified bandwidth. Below that, you have to put in a lot of your own effort, above that you need a very clever installer. On average, it is around 40ct/kWh considering the points you mentioned.
 

Fuchur

2021-08-26 14:50:13
  • #6
No, not at all. Just if the battery lasts twice as long as your assumption, the price is (almost) halved. Only, that is not known today. At least the warranty periods of the manufacturers are now significantly longer than a few years ago. In some federal states, there are funding programs that reimburse almost half the price. With intelligent regulation, you can bypass the 70% limit and so on and so forth. At the core, I am not really a big fan of batteries, but these blanket statements are simply not correct. It is true that electricity from the battery is significantly more expensive than direct photovoltaic electricity, and you cannot get rich saving money this way anyway. If the parameters are not right, you quickly end up paying extra. But each case must be considered individually, and even for myself, I cannot say, because many factors lie in the future. If our battery ever breaks, then one could calculate, before that, it’s just guessing.
 

Similar topics
08.11.2013Electricity at the house connection for provider - Installation of server cabinet10
07.07.2016Electricity and water supply before construction begins?27
13.12.2016Lawn mower with electricity, battery, or petrol?47
08.08.2016Connection costs for telecom, cable, electricity10
06.03.2017Kitchen island - with electricity! A thought experiment...11
03.07.2017Are the costs for the electricity house connection justified?10
06.02.2018Solar for hot water/heating or better photovoltaic for electricity?21
21.02.2018Heating with electricity - infrared heating? Experiences wanted17
15.05.2018Water, gas, and electricity - disconnection and reconnection?10
19.06.2018Help: Identifying causes of high electricity and water costs14
17.02.2019Dimensioning of house connection electricity/gas/water11
08.03.2020Connections for electricity etc. for front yard and garden23
10.02.2021Run electricity from the house to the garage11
28.07.2020Electricity/Telecom connection costs28
28.06.2020Connection for network power supply very expensive?!23
07.03.2022How to connect an outdoor camera? LAN, power or battery25
28.03.2021Strom-Cloud experiences vs. feed-in tariff?94
04.06.2014How can one save electricity?21
13.02.2017With which heating system can I heat cheaply using electricity?11

Oben