Is the land use plan binding? Possibly a building window in forest area?!

A development plan is not planned there, as far as we know. It is an inner-city area with a few building gaps or street sections like this one.

In the neighborhood (especially when zooming out) you can see that red means building land. It also says so in the legend, if I am not mistaken.

Preliminary building inquiries still make no sense for a very long time.

Why is that? If there is no development plan, what chance do I have to get a binding statement on the buildability? Honestly meant question!

The price is significantly higher than for forest land, but still lower than for "real building land". That's why we're considering the whole thing.

Tying up capital in land speculation is more of an investment than suitable for people who have concrete owner-occupier plans with the property.

In the last five years, construction has also taken place above the marked plot; that is completely outside the red building land area. Maybe that's a point in our favor?

That initially sounds like "non-outside area", something may be possible under §34.

Wait for , he's not here as often as I am, but he's the expert – that's better than guessing.

If there is no development plan, what chances do I have to get a binding statement about buildability?

If there are neighboring buildings, that means nothing. I had interpreted the status to mean that a development plan (possibly in many years) is to be expected – then the question wouldn’t make sense yet.

Thank you!! I am trying to practice patience.

Of course, I would prefer only good news, you can probably tell a bit :) But I actually don’t know enough about it, hence the questions.

Our plan now was to clarify with a preliminary building inquiry whether construction is allowed there. So that one has something legally binding in hand. In a phone call, the answer can be like this today, like that tomorrow... Exactly what can be built then, naturally goes later through the building permit.

But now it was said that the preliminary building inquiry makes no sense at all...?

Our plan now was to clarify by means of a preliminary building enquiry whether construction is permitted there. So that you have something legally binding in hand. In a phone call, the answer can be like this today, like that tomorrow...

That's how it is. It is reasonable to take the written route.

But now it was said that a preliminary building enquiry makes no sense at all...?;

Normally: "land use plan says anticipated building land and a development plan does not yet exist" means: that might take until your children want to build.

Your additional note about young buildings in the neighborhood says, however: something has probably happened already. But as I said: wait for the expert, that is more helpful than my opinion.

Above the marked property, construction has also taken place in the last five years, and that is completely outside the red building land area. Perhaps that could be a point in our favor?

No. You are buying land where you (still) cannot build and have no idea when it will become building land. So if you currently have extra money, then buy and wait. If you want a house, then please buy building land and actually build ;-)