Is renegotiation possible for a home loan?

  • Erstellt am 2020-01-22 12:54:16

face26

2020-01-22 22:06:54
  • #1
Regardless of everything else, I don’t understand your example. How long should the remaining term be? Longer than the 6 years, I assume? Also, the question arises why the bank would offer something like that? The bank also has to "secure" the business, which would not be very favorable in an interest rate environment of 6%. But that would get too financial-mathematical now. And overall you must not forget one thing either: the entire processing and associated administration... I can’t imagine that a bank sees any advantage there unless it is afraid that the whole thing is going downhill.
 

HilfeHilfe

2020-01-23 06:29:01
  • #2


yes exactly INVESTMENTS, their liabilities business. They don't want to worsen their assets business after all
 

HilfeHilfe

2020-01-23 06:30:08
  • #3


yes follow-up financing, but in the specific case the loan has only been running for 2 years.

One should differentiate.
 

DTvomHaus

2020-01-24 19:28:43
  • #4
So, a final answer: Thank you to everyone who participated constructively. The discussion was very insightful. There actually would have been some room for maneuver. An extension of the existing loan on the same terms was being considered. So from originally 15 to 20 years and longer at the same rate. However, we decided against it, among other reasons because by using other strategies, we tended to pay off the house earlier.
 

face26

2020-01-24 21:10:43
  • #5
What does room for manoeuvre mean? An extension was offered to you on the same terms. The bank does not incur any interest loss from that. And an extension on those terms would probably still have been worthwhile for the bank. 1.8% for 15 or 20 years from today is not exactly exciting.
 

Tassimat

2020-01-24 23:24:18
  • #6
Worse still, due to the extension, the counter for the special termination right starts again at zero.
 
Oben