..we paid money for such a calculation! Some numbers:...
These numbers are relatively useless for this purpose! They serve, as intended by the legislator,
exclusively a primary energy,
qualitative comparison. It is inadmissible to dimension heating systems or derive consumption from them. For this, read the
fine print in the proof!
....But I have read here that these calculations are often incorrect or have little to do with the actual heating costs.
Exactly! First of all, it should be checked whether an air heat pump is fundamentally sensible. If yes, then a suitable device matching the requirements and necessities must be selected. These are completely unclear here. So first clarify the basics (
actual demand (power, energy) for heating and hot water. Only then can it be assessed in context
which device is suitable. Air heat pumps have a few peculiarities compared to, for example, brine heat pumps.
Defrosting energy is required for the evaporator. This increases the more a device is oversized. (No power modulation) Air heat pumps are "misused" air conditioning units for heating purposes, providing their highest performance when it is not at all necessary. Therefore, full modulation is almost mandatory. Also, at very low outdoor temperatures, the assistance of an electric heating element is necessary. Through precise planning, dimensioning of the overall system, and device selection, it can be achieved that this energy share amounts to only 0.2..max 2% of the annual heating effort and thus hardly affects the total consumption costs. Air heat pumps have manufacturer-specific, very differentiated heating performance and COP curves. If this is not sufficiently considered, higher consumption costs must be expected. Unlike other heat generators, specifications such as 6 kW output are completely meaningless, as the output depends, among other parameters, on the outdoor temperature.
Well-planned air heat pump systems reach an annual performance factor of ~ 3.5 (heating, hot water) or better. Without sufficient planning, one can be unlucky and have to settle for an annual performance factor of 2.3...2.7. There are plenty of examples of this.
Example: actual energy demand for heating and hot water = 10,000 kWh.
Annual performance factor = 3.5 => consumption 2,857 kWh/a Annual performance factor = 2.3 => consumption 4,348 kWh/a
Additional consumption: 1,491 kWh/a now calculate with the electricity price over 20..25 years. Take into account a reasonable price increase. This quickly amounts to three..four-digit € sums. For this, the costs for precise overall planning are peanuts. If you have questions, send me an e-mail or a private message.
Best regards