Hello,
first of all, thanks for the many contributions!!! That’s exactly how I imagined it. Also to hear other ideas and different ways of thinking.
I want to comment on a few points.
1) The topic of romance/house construction/wife for life/etc. was often mentioned. I have to say, it is not quite clear how we want/should handle this financially. That is all currently open. But I can definitely say that for us, it has nothing to do with romance how one approaches financial planning, house construction, retirement provision, or similar. I am of the opinion that anyone who views such things with "romance" could experience a rude awakening here and there. We see it very matter-of-factly. It’s about money. Not about our "romantic" relationship. Since I myself come from the East, I know what the first responder means. In many people's eyes, confusing a love relationship with asset building/home ownership/retirement provision is a gross mistake. But apparently everyone is different there.
2) How is the financial matter regulated between me and my partner? That is an open question. We are (still) not married. The topic is also complex because she is self-employed and already owns a property in which she does not live. Children are not excluded; if that happens, we will certainly consider marriage. For the reasons mentioned above like inheritance, death, rights in many life situations, etc. I mean the "official" marriage, not the traditional romantic wedding. (Maybe we also want to have a romantic church wedding, but that is not a topic for this forum.) Nevertheless, in our constellation this topic is somewhat more complex and must/will also be reviewed by a tax advisor.
3) The bank has no problem with this in my case, would probably even go significantly higher than I want to spend. Exact quote: "At that amount, you are far from reaching your limit..."
We also do not live in the South, but here in eastern NRW the euro is no longer worth a whole euro either. As I said, there is hardly any existing property to renovate heating, sanitary facilities, floors, and walls for less than €250,000–300,000. I currently have a house from the late 90s in mind where practically nothing would need to be done. Cost: €485,000 for property transfer tax (6.5% in NRW!!!!) and paperwork about another €30,000 on top. No broker fee (those are criminal costs anyway). Then a bit of sprucing up and putting in a kitchen and voilà, you’re at €530,000. That would be a loan amount of about €380,000 for me...
4) I am of the opinion that if the salary is higher, generally a higher percentage of the salary can be taken for the installments. Because although there is proportionally less left, absolutely still enough money can be available for a decent life. A piece of butter costs the same for someone who earns €2,000 and someone who earns €5,000. In short; if someone with €2,000 net gives 50%, i.e. €1,000 to the bank, they have "only" €1,000 left for the rest (car, vacation, children, food, etc.). If it is someone who earns €5,000 net, they have €2,500 left for the rest. So it is relative. This percent-of-salary rule is all the more significant the less you earn, I think.
Maybe I am simply too insecure about us in my head.