How expensive can the construction project become at most?

It is best to buy this separately from the house construction to save taxes.

The greater advantage, in my opinion, lies in the freedom that owning a plot of land brings. The freedom to build independently of the land with a general contractor/subcontractor or architect of your choice. This is better than being forcibly tied to the building partner together with the desired plot of land.

It is then also easier to implement special wishes (that deviate from the standard of the developer) or to build cost-effectively (individual contracting, own work). Or to have special wishes fulfilled at a reasonable price.

My tip > save for your equity and don’t hesitate.

The threads are becoming increasingly abstract

In 6 years there will be a GErmanexit. Currency devaluation. If you don't own a property yet, your equity will be devalued and nationalized

unnu ??

These are great prerequisites. Roughly, you should know WHAT you want to build (including how the house should look visually): This is essential because not all ideas can be realized in all building areas (cf. development plans). As soon as you know this (at least the general direction) - you should take care of a building plot - this can definitely take some time. Once the building plot is secured, the next phase of looking for a house builder can begin. Good luck.

Roughly, you should know WHAT you want to build [...]

What you write is absolutely right, and it is often presented exactly like that here and elsewhere. However, I would search the other way around. First the building plot (the property) and then I would plan the house on it. For me, the location is more important than the appearance or type of the house. And a habitable house can basically be built on any plot (in an area where single-family houses stand, that's what we're talking about).

This of course does not mean that you first *buy* and then think. But you shouldn't fixate on one (e.g.) type of city villa and exclude the dream plot because only bungalows are allowed there (or vice versa).

Absolutely right, what you write, and it is often presented exactly like that here and elsewhere. However, I would search the other way around. First the building plot (the land) and then I would plan the house on it. For me, the location is more important than the appearance or type of the house. And a habitable house can actually be built on any plot (in whose surroundings there are single-family houses, that's what we are talking about).

Of course, that does not mean that you *buy* first and then think. You just shouldn’t fixate on one (e.g.) type of town villa and then exclude the dream plot because only bungalows are allowed there (or vice versa).

Yes and no: Whoever wants a bungalow (or everything on one level) tends to need a larger plot. I didn’t mean that you should "restrict" yourself with quasi specifications, but that you should know what you want to build. My experience in searching for building plots shows me that you really have to be able to read (and understand) the development plans well. If, for example, I absolutely want a flat roof, that considerably limits the search.

I share your opinion that location is naturally one of the most important points. That should be undisputed. But then you have to check promptly whether you can and want to operate within the framework of the valid development plan. If yes, all is well; if not, it means keep searching. As soon as there is a reasonable infrastructure on site (doctors, pharmacy, shopping facilities, schools, etc.), it becomes apparent that land prices (as in recent years) will rise.