voicepoint
2020-05-02 13:59:02
- #1
Hello everyone,
we are currently in the planning phase.
It is supposed to be a single-family house with a basement. The ground floor and upper floor are to be built using timber frame construction, the basement either with solid masonry or precast concrete construction (half underground due to sloping site).
The ground floor and upper floor basically meet the KFW 40 standard. Accordingly, a (partial) integration of the basement would probably make sense. Depending on the decision regarding the 52 GW cap, it might also become a 40+ house (ventilation system will be installed in any case).
In the basement, a utility/technical room is planned, the rest of the basement is to be used as a garage. According to the current plan, the heating system will be located in the utility room, so this room must be included in the thermal building envelope.
At present, I see 5 different options to implement this (1-3 could also be built "slimmed down" for KFW 55):
1) Only include the utility room in the thermal envelope
2) Include the entire basement in the thermal envelope (garage door?!)
3) Create a separate, as small as possible room in the basement for the heating system and leave the rest outside the thermal envelope
4) Do without any measures and not use the KFW loan + subsidy
5) Extend the ground floor by a technical room exclusively for the heating system (electricity, ventilation, etc. remain in the basement)
All options naturally differ in costs but also allow for higher subsidies.
We were currently offered a 20cm thick slab in C20/25, the basement level in masonry or concrete, an external wall insulation of the basement with 120mm as well as a screed with 50mm insulation in the utility room. With the note that probably additional insulation measures are necessary (perimeter insulation).
Which route would you take or what is sensible? Is there a better solution that we have overlooked?
Thank you very much and best regards
Noel

we are currently in the planning phase.
It is supposed to be a single-family house with a basement. The ground floor and upper floor are to be built using timber frame construction, the basement either with solid masonry or precast concrete construction (half underground due to sloping site).
The ground floor and upper floor basically meet the KFW 40 standard. Accordingly, a (partial) integration of the basement would probably make sense. Depending on the decision regarding the 52 GW cap, it might also become a 40+ house (ventilation system will be installed in any case).
In the basement, a utility/technical room is planned, the rest of the basement is to be used as a garage. According to the current plan, the heating system will be located in the utility room, so this room must be included in the thermal building envelope.
At present, I see 5 different options to implement this (1-3 could also be built "slimmed down" for KFW 55):
1) Only include the utility room in the thermal envelope
2) Include the entire basement in the thermal envelope (garage door?!)
3) Create a separate, as small as possible room in the basement for the heating system and leave the rest outside the thermal envelope
4) Do without any measures and not use the KFW loan + subsidy
5) Extend the ground floor by a technical room exclusively for the heating system (electricity, ventilation, etc. remain in the basement)
All options naturally differ in costs but also allow for higher subsidies.
We were currently offered a 20cm thick slab in C20/25, the basement level in masonry or concrete, an external wall insulation of the basement with 120mm as well as a screed with 50mm insulation in the utility room. With the note that probably additional insulation measures are necessary (perimeter insulation).
Which route would you take or what is sensible? Is there a better solution that we have overlooked?
Thank you very much and best regards
Noel