11ant
2018-06-05 19:16:41
- #1
I consider that a too quickly drawn conclusion. From "aunt" I infer that you might be among the heirs (but not directly related in a straight line), and from "older generation" that up until the inheritance event, perhaps not three times ten years will be fully completed (?)My aunt (older generation) owns a three-family house from the 60s that will need renovations in the near future. Apart from a boiler replacement, nothing has been done so far. She lives off the rental income but has no money to invest in the renovations. Ergo, it comes down to selling.
In this respect, I primarily see a tax planning issue here.
For a three-family house, the most obvious approach to me would be to first divide it into individual ownership units. For one apartment, I would expect that the tenant (himself or possibly adult children) could be interested in purchasing; the aunt would keep a second one entirely for herself; and for the third, she could gift you an ownership share in exchange for a corresponding renunciation of inheritance. This is just sketched out roughly with a blunt pencil, only a good tax advisor can refine it. Such an advisor might also say, for example, to contribute this and that (still undeveloped) plot of land together into a company.
A three-family house alone can just still be regarded as a building – but together with another property, in my opinion, the boundary is crossed where one should primarily consider it a (not least for tax reasons) asset.