House placement on an unusual plot

Hello everyone,

we have an unusual plot and are unsure where to place the house, driveway, and carport. Later, a garden shed for lawnmower, bicycles, etc. is to be added. The exterior dimensions of the house are 11.60 m x 9.60 m. Attached you will find the surveyor’s plan, the floor plans, and a visualization of how we might imagine it. The development plan does not include any significant restrictions, except: "Covered parking spaces, garages and ancillary facilities are not permitted up to a building depth of 3 meters." The two pines in the north can be felled. Regarding the neighbors: to the east there is a bungalow, the property directly north is accessed via the driveway to the west. The first wider part is a turning area for the fire department. The driveway belongs to the rear property. No house is on it yet. The street to the south is a dead end, we are the second to last property.

A brief explanation of our visualization: we have planned the HTR as a side entrance/mudroom and then attached the carport, which starts at the level of the HTR and extends beyond the depth of the house, providing access to the rear. We would like to create a terrace all around the southwest side. However, we are open to entirely different suggestions and look forward to feedback. Thank you very much!

Development plan/restrictions
Plot size: 804 m2
Floor area ratio: 0.3
Building line: 3m
Number of parking spaces: 1
Number of floors: 1.5
Roof shape: gable roof, 35 degrees

Requirements of the builders
Number of people: 2 adults, 2 children
Office: 2x workrooms required
Carport or garage and later a garden shed

Your property sketches are in my opinion somewhat difficult to interpret, especially if you orient them differently in each picture. Ideally, all should be aligned evenly to the north. I find this wording from the office amusing:

"Covered parking spaces, garages and ancillary facilities are not permitted up to a building depth of 3m meters."

At first, I thought the buildings were not allowed to be deeper than 3m – which would be something new somewhere. :D I guess they mean that no outbuildings are allowed to be built in the setback zones. If that is the case, please confirm. Or is it only about the street setback? That brings me to the first question right away: Your overly long (approx. 30m???) driveway lies on the property boundary and ends there in a (vertically) impermissible carport? Or is an actual boundary development on the east side also permitted for non-privileged buildings? I assume the access to the northern property (aside from the fire department turning area) is not public?

Your property sketches are imho somewhat difficult to interpret, especially if you orient them differently with each picture. Ideally, you should align them all uniformly to the north. I find this wording from the office amusing: I initially thought the buildings were not allowed to be deeper than 3m – which would be something new somewhere. :D I guess they mean that no outbuildings may be built in the setback zones. If that is the case, please confirm. Or is it only about the street setback? That brings me to the first question right away: Your overly long (about 30m???) driveway lies on the property boundary and ends there in a (vertically) impermissible carport? Or is an actual boundary construction also permitted on the east side for non-privileged buildings? The access to the northern property (except for the fire department turning circle) is not public, I assume?

Thank you for your response. Attached everything is oriented to the north.

The building depth refers to the first 3m from the street side. No parking spaces, garages, or ancillary facilities are allowed here. This would correspond to the local typical appearance. However, our neighbor has a carport directly on the street, but a different development plan applies there.

A boundary construction for parking spaces including driveways, garages, and ancillary facilities is otherwise permitted as long as an overall length of 15 m and a length of 9 m along a property boundary are not exceeded. The access to the northern property is not public and the fire department turning circle actually belongs to the northern property as well; this was regulated by an easement.

hm, basically okay. Due to the long driveway, I would have the feeling that there is still a lot of potential for improvement. Have you ever tried orienting the house at the other property boundary, so that the now eastern side opens somewhat to the south, allowing access to be planned there and consequently the parking spaces more towards the southeast?

hm, basically alright. However, due to the long driveway, I would have the feeling that there is still a lot of potential for improvement.
Have you ever tried orienting the house towards the other property boundary so that the now eastern side opens a bit to the south, allowing access to be planned there and as a result the parking spaces more towards the southeast?

I have marked it as I understood it. I am not sure which "other property boundary" is meant. Does this fit?

we have an unusual plot

I would especially say: a multiply enviable, unproblematic plot to build on. Almost the opposite of what has :)

and are unsure where we want to place the house, driveway, and carport.

Well, the agony of choice truly hits you here full force, yet I read

The exterior dimensions of the house are 11.60 m x 9.60 m.

as an indication of a possibly very unfortunate "planning" approach. Even though you have the easiest-to-maintain building window here – and the nicest usage template! – of the entire forum (at least in the five and a half years I’ve been overseeing it), a floor plan should never be designed before placement. One moves, shifts, and rotates a concept or at most a preliminary draft, but not a design with largely fixed dimensions anymore. In this respect, I fear you are even "planning" with a construction company "architect" aka draftsman's assistant.