Hello,
We have also discussed this verbally with the site management.
I now wanted to have this confirmed in writing, and now it says:
Quote
according to our contract, we do not owe you a retaining wall along the northern property boundary. The slope can be seen on the site plan and the formation of this is possible with an inclination of 30°.
If you still want a retaining wall and a level garden, we can provide you with an offer for this additional service
End Quote
[...]
I think a scope of work description for the exterior area is not unusual, or is it?
At least here it is part of the notarized contract.
Exact wording:
Terrain graduations with a slope under 30 degrees are obliterated.
...
Steeper slopes or terrain to be held back receive a support with exposed concrete angle stones, gray color including foundation
That is the problem with verbal agreements!
I am not allowed to provide legal advice here – in Germany this is exclusively reserved for consulting professions – and therefore I have to be careful what I write. However – as far as I understand the wording – and the possibility exists to keep <30°, you are the last one, because you will not step directly from the side door onto the slope... figuratively speaking.
You are buying a house including the plot from a single source, which is why the usual declarations are also in the notary contract. You can either try to achieve a different solution through a lawyer you trust, purchase the services for the L-walls under reservation and then have your lawyer find a post-contractual solution, or bite the bullet directly and accept the additional offer.
This case is extremely borderline and I do not know any comparable ruling off the top of my head. Therefore, I assume that only an amicable solution will be productive. Everything else will, in my opinion, only cost you more money and in the end will turn out like the Hornberger Shooting – with the small but fine difference that your lawyer will be the only one happy. In case of a settlement, he gets to bill twice according to BRAGO.
Rhenish regards